As much rhetoric is being cast about here with regard to Rowland, it's merits and perhaps some suspicious intents, which I've dismissed completely from my mind, would anyone care to compare any of these Lillyputian Giant killers to other more well known topologies and/or brands of amps by way of sonic diffs?
I should think that would glean certainly myself, and any other's on the digi ICE fence more palpable insights on what to expect.
Like for example: my xxx was as dynamic as my Krell, but sweet as my Carrisa on the top end.
or ... My xxx was as warm and musical as my SET mono's in the mids but far greater slam in the lower regions... etc.
guido, among others here has already seen in this instance anyways, I'll not be diving into a pair of Spectron Musician s, rowland 312s, or BC 500 - 1000 monos, anytime soon.
had I that sort of duckets to spend I'd be looking at Pass' XA 60.5 or 100.5 amps probably first... then the Spectron's & Rowlands thereafter. Maybe.
Thanks eternally.
I should think that would glean certainly myself, and any other's on the digi ICE fence more palpable insights on what to expect.
Like for example: my xxx was as dynamic as my Krell, but sweet as my Carrisa on the top end.
or ... My xxx was as warm and musical as my SET mono's in the mids but far greater slam in the lower regions... etc.
guido, among others here has already seen in this instance anyways, I'll not be diving into a pair of Spectron Musician s, rowland 312s, or BC 500 - 1000 monos, anytime soon.
had I that sort of duckets to spend I'd be looking at Pass' XA 60.5 or 100.5 amps probably first... then the Spectron's & Rowlands thereafter. Maybe.
Thanks eternally.