Jeff Rowland Concentra VS Krell KAV300i???????


Help anyone with some input?
I am considering either amplifier!

To drive a pair of: Sonus Faber Electa Amator!
Thank you
rapogee
I bought a Krell 300i when I moved to the US. It seemed great when I demoed it, but the sound started to grate my ears after a while (driving Snell A3i). The good part was that it was easy to sell because of the Krell name.

I haven't heard the Rowland, but it must be better.
I own both. There is no comparison whatsoever. In fact I can't conceive of anyone being confused on this issue if viewing them side by side. The Rowland is an engineering marvel while the Krell looks like another piece of mass produced crap. Soundwise they have as much in common as Quad and Klipsch.
On the used market a Concentra II will cost you about 4 times as much as a KAV 300i, so the comparison seems ludicrous in that context and the performance disparity seems justifiable.
If you can buy the Rowland, don't hesitate.
All the more reason to check out the Passion. I liked it better than the Concentra. Also, marvelously built, with a world class remote. Let your tympanics guide you to nirvana. You won't be sorry with the Concentra or the Passion. But, I do agree, the Krell is just not happening. Couldn't go one round with either of these babies. FWIW. peace, warren
Hey, it's been a year. Give us an update. Don't be ashamed if you bought the Krell.
I wouldn't match Rowland with SF. Krell's a better match. In fact, Franco uses Krell monos...