Jena Labs

I strongly suggest you try the MIT Oracle V1.1 I know I know believe me i tried everything but MIT at first just because i couldn't get the thought of what was in those darn network boxes out of my head. But I must say after finally auditioning them I quickly purchased them on the spot because 1.)Detail micro and macro incredible 2.)Highs are simply sublime(ultra wide band version by the way) and 3.)The bass is simply the lowest and most well defined i have heard period! at $15.600 cheap they are not but if you have the means who would dare put a price on audio nirvana!!! not me.

I guess the lesson here is don't assume anything about a product or person for that matter strictly based on here say LISTEN FOR YOUR SELF AND FORM YOUR OWN OPINIONS! is
always the best rule of thumb.

Definitive

I searched with many speaker cables for two years and
have stopped with the Jena's. They just sound right
in my system.

My experience mimic's Saxman2's search Jena labs here and you'll read my glowing comments of a truly GREAT product.

here we go... most cables fall into 2 camps.

there is the "fast" camp that has great imaging, bass, and speed ( xlo comes to mind)

there is the "warm" camp that is lush,bloom, and no image specificty and no detail(ie cardas)

may want to try changing out 1 set of interconnects.

recently picked up a pair of wireworld eclipse 5.and they are really a great midrange ic that is ever so lightly lush on the vocals and very good extension on the extemes and images extremly well

i use them with xlo signiture II ( very neutral "fast" cable imo) and form a great synergy together.

cable interactions within a system are individually based and goal is find a synergestic combination that is to your liking.

cables have basic sonic fingerprint, and depending on your gear, speakers, room,and listening taste may or may not work. that is why you need to audition cables in your system and with differnt combinations. stop by the local shop and try to get as many cables as you can and do your own comparison..you might be surprised to find out what combination works best.

i.e i always use to use the same interconnect between cd to pre and pre to amp. i tried the xlo signiture II between pre to amp and differnt ic between cd to pre and have been amazed by the results.. i have not found a better cable than the xlo signiture II between my ar ls-12 and pse studio v's. and when i tried another pair between cd to pre ( it was too lean in the midrange)i have tried numerous other ic between cd to pre and have ended up with the wireworld eclipse 5.

i have tried ALOT of cardas products ( cross, golden cross, hex golden 5c, hex 5, and neutral) and they are a very colored ( overly lush ) with the exception of the neutral ( too much siblence in my system).and when i used 2 pair, it was too much warmth, lask of detail, and imaging...dont get me wrong i have heard cardas cables sound very nice in other systems...but not mine.

what i have found is all cables have a "sonic signiture" and when used together ( more than once) it really magnifies that "paticular" sonic signiture.

think about it, the signal is amplified 3 times through 3 sets of cables.( i am not including power cables...that is a differnt discussion..they are just as important as ic or speaker cables in a high resolution system..imo anyway)

the type of sound you are looking for is difficult..(speed and lush are too differnt camps).i have recently added some wireworld products in my system and am very pleased ( i am not affilaited with wireworld or a audio shop.. i am a pharmaceutical rep). they are revealing but not bright and have a midrange "richness" that works really well in my all solid state system ( also added a wireworld power cable and was very pleased by the results)

hope that helps!!!

mike

Proy,
I have the Harmonix SLC speaker cables in my system- Eggleston Andras, Krell FPB600, Hovland HP100 with MC phono, Sim Audio Moon Eclipse CDP, VPI Scout JMW9 with Transfiguration Spirit Mk3 MC, Ic's are all Transparent Ref with XL, phono cable is a special half valhalla. In this system I have been able to try Kharma Enigma Reference, Nordost Valhalla, Silversmith silver, AP Solo oval 9, discovery essential, and a few others. My feeling (like many others) is that cabling helps you tune the system to your tastes. What is the cat's ass for one is simply litter box fodder for the next. In my system, to my ears, I much preferred the Harmonix to all the others regardless of cost. The valhallas were bass theives, the silversmiths were close to the Harmonix but not as tonally correct to my ears, the kharma just a bit too rich, and you get my drift. Just on a power cord note, I tried the Harmonix Studio Master on all the components in my system. While I liked it on my Eclipse CD player, the Shunyata Python did the trick for me. This could be because the Sim has been described as a bit cool or whitish on top and the Studio Master PC showed me how much. I thought you might want to hear my two cents as the valhalla speaker cable did not work for either of us. We are certainly in the minority on that one. I also love what the transparent cabling did for my system. I preferred it to valhalla between amp and preamp for example. I would say try the harmonix SLC if you can. It was the final piece in the puzzle for me to snap my system into the "I think I'm done!" category.

Whatever.