Yes we tried doing the same auto-calibration system in many different configurations all with the same negative results to the quality of the sound.
Documented years ago in diyforum, we tried many auto-calibration circuits for the Lightspeed Attenuator, to try to save a large percentage of production costs, of parts costs and labour cost and of the tedious task of quad matching the led/ldr's.
Active auto-calibration (or to give it a more understandable name) "forced matching" circuits have to be attached to the signal carrying output, there is no way around this.
On all the auto-calibration circuits we tried to save on these costs, we came to the final conclusion that they all interfered with the purity of sound. In that they added a highlighted sound to mid to high frequencies. And in effect seemed to reduce the bass a touch at the same time.
So to cut a long story short we stayed with the purer far more costlier system of quad matching all led/ldr's for the Lightspeed Attenuator and auto-calibration was not considered option no matter how well it was designed.
Cheers George
Documented years ago in diyforum, we tried many auto-calibration circuits for the Lightspeed Attenuator, to try to save a large percentage of production costs, of parts costs and labour cost and of the tedious task of quad matching the led/ldr's.
Active auto-calibration (or to give it a more understandable name) "forced matching" circuits have to be attached to the signal carrying output, there is no way around this.
On all the auto-calibration circuits we tried to save on these costs, we came to the final conclusion that they all interfered with the purity of sound. In that they added a highlighted sound to mid to high frequencies. And in effect seemed to reduce the bass a touch at the same time.
So to cut a long story short we stayed with the purer far more costlier system of quad matching all led/ldr's for the Lightspeed Attenuator and auto-calibration was not considered option no matter how well it was designed.
Cheers George