Listening room in Attic or Living room???

FWIW, I have my listening room in my attic area. It is totally 400 sq. ft. & the listening area is 19' X 17'. There is a little alcove about 11' X 7' that I share w/ my wife - this her hobby area right next to window where she needs more light for sketching, painting, stitching, etc. We mutually agreed that we did not want my "ugly" speakers (no matter which brand they are, they are misfits in her living room as a living room, according to her, is traditionally devoid of speakers) in the living room. I was happy w/ that decision 'cuz I would be able to control what goes & what does not go onto the walls for the best acoustics. So, now, we are both happy - she has her living room furnished just as she wants & I have listening room w/ all the acoustic treatments I need!

My attic room has "coffered" ceilings - straight wall for 6'3" & then slopes upwards to the ceiling for 2-2.5'. Ceiling height is 9' in the listening area & 8' in my wife's area (due to the roof sloping down). I own Green Mountain speakers & from Roy Johnson's user manual, "coffered" ceilings are one of the best to have sound-wise. It helps to "throw" back the sound into the room + there is much less parallel walls so the room effects are less intense. My acoustic treatments are several ASC tube traps only. No panels on the walls. The sound in this room is explemplary, if I may say so. Many friends have come over & exclaimed the same. I did not know what this coffered ceiling was going to do to the sound when I 1st began (but I had no choice) but now, I prefer it!

I disagree w/ the others re. consulting Rives. They are not worth your hard-earned dollars, IMO. Of course, the decision & money is yours & you can still choose to use them. What you really need is to get hold of some room measurement software (ETF or that German software touted in Stereophile), a mic & your computer. This can very easily do the job w/ infinitly less money than Rives. Apply some common sense, do a lot of research on which building materials are best for sound. There is a book on acoustics available at Amazon.com or Barnes & Nobles that talks ad nauseum on building a room for best acoustics. Get a hold of this book. If you are lazy, you can call Rives to do your job (& pay them some astronomical fees!).

IMO, if YOU want good sound, YOU better know what it takes to get it! If somebody else does the work for you, YOU will never learn. YOU need to train your ears to ascertain the weaknesses & strong points of your system (& others) so that YOU can grow as an audiophile. Of course, this is just my opinion. YMMV.

BTW, just checked my notes: the book I'm referring to is called "The Master Handbook of Acoustics"- by Everest. My notes also inform me that partsexpress.com has the best price on it.
Just FYI. FWIW.

Bombaywalla, you bring up some good points. However Dbk is planning on spending up to $50,000 on this system. The cost for an expert opinon that may have greater effect on his total system than any combination of components (except perhaps for the room correction devices previously mentioned )coupled with the experience that an expert may have to keep the reconstruction hassles of his home to a minmum, seems like a bargain to me (of course the caveat about moving still applies). Rooms may effect sound by as much as +/- 10 dB, I can't think of many components that vary that much. The rooms he is considering vary greatly, are not simple square or rectangle boxes and as such would take more than the typical amount of study to get a handle on. Considering that one can not "return" self designed reconstruction efforts, mistakes or dissatisfaction could be quite costly, in both money and aggrevation. Furthermore, if one were to take your advise why stop there? Might as well get an EE degree and design and manufacture all the gear too. Heck, why stop there one could study medicine, law, you get the point. An initial consultation by an expert in a system of this cost may be less than the cost of some cables or a power purifier.

Unsound,
Re. studying all the disciplines & becoming a Leonardo da Vinci - yes, I see your point.
I also agree w/ you that the room acoustics are paramount to making a stereo sound its best. I never denied that in any way, shape or form in my orig. post. Au contraire, I am acutely aware of this.

However, I still disagree w/ the audio/acoustic consultant bit. Maybe we should agree to disagree??
IMHO, Dbk does *not* need to spend $40-50K to get a stellar sounding system. He can have one for much, much less & spend the remaining on music. However, the decision is his & I merely state my opinion. It is a myth in audio that more expensive equip. brings better sound quality & enjoyment. In fact, I find just a handful of manuf. to provide both ridiculously expensive gear & stellar audio perf. I'm sure you agree so we will not debate this.

Re. room treatments: I'm certainly *not* suggesting experimentation! Even I know that one cannot return self designed reconstruction efforts! That's why I suggested that audio (text)book so that he can educate himself. That text explains how to make one's room the best it can practically be w/ readily available materials. Unless Dbk is building his house to his specifications, the room(s) he is considering are pretty much set in shape. Now it's a matter of what type of sheet rock or Owens-Corning boards to use for best sound. For those lucky friends of mine who have had the luxury to re-construct an attic or basement I have seen how acoustic treatments have been made part of the construction & have been put to excellent sonic effect. For the remainder of my friends & myself who could not have that luxury I have seen how post-construction acoustic treatment has given practically the same positive sonic effect to their resp. listening rooms. NONE of these people sought an acoustic or audio consultant & most of them do not have engineering/science degrees. Lots of research of A'gon, AA (where Rives does post frequently) & Rives' sub-forum & a very healthy dose of common-sense. The last ingredient was the most important one, might I add. One needs to know when to call it quits w.r.t. treating a room otherwise, one gets taken for a ride. One can only make such an informed decision if one has some knowledge base within oneself.
As it might be clear, I'm all for self-education on this hobby IFFFFF one cares to be a better audiophile as time progresses.

Perhaps we can be of help--at least to this thread. We firmly believe that education in acoustics is the first step, whether you hire a professional group like ours to do the work, or you are the DIY type. Here is a link to our "acoustical classroom" The most important thing is NOT to ignore the room, which is so often the case. Engineering and designing a listening room are both an art and a science. The science can be gathered from text books mentioned (they are on our site as well), the art is from experience. We do more designs in a month than most groups do in year--and I'm still learning. Every design and every room unfolds something new and I doubt I will ever stop learning. So I don't think this is easily replaced by reading a few books and taking a few measurements (even how you take measurements is not as straight forward as it might seem at first). However, it's much better to read a few books, take a few measurements, and address some of the problems rather than ignoring them. You will be way ahead of the many audiophiles that have completely forgotten or ignored the room.

Here is another Q&A that talks about the difference in the art and science for one particular aspect of room and speaker design.
6 Moons Q&A