Looking for my Final Pair!!

atmasphere : my mistake but I’m not need your post as a reference because makes no sense at all:

" The use of a sub is good, but in order to really take advantage of that, you’d have to make sure no bass is getting into the Cornwalls. "

No bass? really? Then let us know what is your first hand experience to do that in the CW or other similar passive speaker.

I stated in the thread the normal low/high pass crossover frequency to make lower the CW IMD .

The other part in reference to use an electronic crossover:

" muddy the sound, eliminating any perceived advantage ...."

dave is doing your " muddy the sound " through the REL crossover. At least I posted this way of connection after he posted the REL manual operation and he don't tell me he is doing in other way . 

You make critics and as always with out facts. Please bring/show here your first hand experiences with measures that proves your " muddy sound eliminating ANY perceived advantage ".

it’s stupid to think that all subs in home places are used stand alone as low bass reinforcement only.

So what are you talking about? 

You can take all the examples I posted of manufacturers in the thread that use subs with its main speakers and they made the design for the subs handled only a part of the bass range not all bass through the subs as you posted:
"" NO BASS is getting..... "

R.

Try psychotherapy Raul 😉

I’ve found my final pair of speakers although I do enjoy others in my stable, but the ultimate island speakers for me are the Genesis G500. They do everything right and can be placed in most rooms comfortably. Flat to 20hz and coherent to rival any modern design. 
I’ve been an audiophile for 35 years and I get chills every time I sit down for a listen on these guys! 
https://www.stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/184/index.html

I am familiar with the G500’s...enjoy!

You make critics and as always with out facts. Please bring/show here your first hand experiences with measures that proves your " muddy sound eliminating ANY perceived advantage ".

Lol!! ROFLMAO! Raul, first, you don't present measurements here, so you're asking me to do so yet in the same breath, asking for anecdotal perception.


But if you want a nice anecdote, you know I show at audio shows. One year at RMAF we had a ballroom. The system in that room had to be able to play the entire room. John, of Classic Audio Loudspeakers, thought it would be fun to bring an electronic crossover and bi-amplify the system. So we had an amp on the woofers and another in the highs, each driven by the output of the crossover. Recordings I knew well just didn't have the detail that I knew was there, and also knew that the speakers and amps could easily do.


So we removed the crossover and ran the speakers full range (since they have a proper crossover anyway) and the problem was fixed. The simple fact is a crossover can rob the system of resolution.


Note the word 'can' in the sentence above; it suggests a possibility;  not that it always does. You have to be careful of the setup. You took my comments out of context without the important qualifiers. You can't just use any crossover; some work and some don't; if they rob the system of detail you're better off without.