From your checklist of seven, I would have to give the first six in favor of V2. As for 'musicality', it being more subjective--perception, bias, taste, preference come into larger play here--you will have to decide that for yourself. And to add to Cmalak's already excellent comparative notes, I will just add that being more honest and transparent of the two, V2 does demand that extra care/attention to the choices of equipments and cabling used. In comparison, Cremona is way less fussy and easier to make sing. Imo, it is better to get the more transparent, neutrally balanced speaker first, then tailor that musicality aspect to your liking later with your choices/preferred gears. And yes I fully agree--still it is best to make time, go for that joy ride and form your own opinions.
Magico V2 vs. Sonus Faber Cremona M
Hi, I'm pretty new to high end hifi and this is my first posting here. So this question might sound silly but I hope the gurus can help me out here.
I'm seriously considering the Magico V2 or the Sonus Faber Cremona M. Can anyone share on the different characterictics of these 2 floorstanders in terms of soundstaging, imaging, bass, transparency, airiness, clarity, musicality?
Also what amp would best match these 2 speakers? I favour integrated amps.
Personal audition is very difficult and inconvenient for me as I would have to drive 200km to do it. So I depend very much on reviews and forums. Your response would be greatly appreciated and welcomed.
I'm seriously considering the Magico V2 or the Sonus Faber Cremona M. Can anyone share on the different characterictics of these 2 floorstanders in terms of soundstaging, imaging, bass, transparency, airiness, clarity, musicality?
Also what amp would best match these 2 speakers? I favour integrated amps.
Personal audition is very difficult and inconvenient for me as I would have to drive 200km to do it. So I depend very much on reviews and forums. Your response would be greatly appreciated and welcomed.
- ...
- 36 posts total
- 36 posts total