Dear Kirk: +++++ " Now I understand and respect a design approach that tolerates a mismatch here to acheive other objectives, but in terms of noise performance for i.e. a 5-ohm phono cartridge, a well-executed transformer/autoformer input topology will ALWAYS perform best. " +++++
I have to disagree with you here because IMHO that depends on the design, that btw we don't tolerate any mismatch at any single level " to achieve other objectives ".
+++++ " NOT deliver their best noise performance when coupled directly to an input stage, especially one that uses JFETs... " +++++
here I agree with you.
+++++ " There is simply too much variation in cartridge design and manufacturing methods to be able to allow EVERY cartrige to work its best with a single type of phono preamp .. " +++++
again it depends on the design.
+++++ " And finally, the biggest issue with improper cartridge loading has very little to do with the transformer or the lack thereof, but with the lack of standards and consistency among cartridge manufacturers... " +++++
that's another reason why the SUTs are not the best way to go.
Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.
I have to disagree with you here because IMHO that depends on the design, that btw we don't tolerate any mismatch at any single level " to achieve other objectives ".
+++++ " NOT deliver their best noise performance when coupled directly to an input stage, especially one that uses JFETs... " +++++
here I agree with you.
+++++ " There is simply too much variation in cartridge design and manufacturing methods to be able to allow EVERY cartrige to work its best with a single type of phono preamp .. " +++++
again it depends on the design.
+++++ " And finally, the biggest issue with improper cartridge loading has very little to do with the transformer or the lack thereof, but with the lack of standards and consistency among cartridge manufacturers... " +++++
that's another reason why the SUTs are not the best way to go.
Regards and enjoy the music.
Raul.