Hard to say what YOU will like best but the McIntosh 2205 is 25 years older than the others you listed. That may not be a problem per se but devices have advanced since the 70s. I preferred my MC7200 over my buddy's 4B (he did too) but the 7200 is a great amp. The MC2002 got a better review in Audio magazine than the 2205 and you may find one of those for $1k. The Mc will be more musical than the 4B at any rate, IMO. Don't know Marsh at all. Good luck! Arthur
Mcintosh MC-2205, Bryston 4B-ST, or Marsh a400
Hey. I have $1000 to spend on an amplifier. Im running 2 Definitive Technology BP7004's which are pretty efficient, rated at 91Db. Ive heard about Mcintosh and Definitive being magic together but I would like to explore my other options. Im looking for a very musical sound but I also want a lot of punch, dynamics, and control. All the amps are rated from 200 watts per channel to 250 watts per channel. My room is small, about 12' x 12'. If I get Mcintosh, I will get a Mcintosh preamp. If I go Marsh I will get a Marsh preamp. If I go Bryston, I will get a Bryston preamp. Let me know what will suite my tastes the best.
Thanks! :D
Thanks! :D
- ...
- 3 posts total
- 3 posts total