2. speakers
  3. 1126857758

MJ Acoustics Subwoofers v. REL.

REL has been the first name for many when it comes to subwoofers for music.
But I'm hearing more and more good things about MJ Acoustics, which someone told me is staffed by a gang of ex-REL personnel who decided to go off and do their own thing.
MJ make a model 200 which is pitched directly at REL Strata territory and it has received excellent press in the UK and elsewhere.
Has anyone got their hands on one over here?
It's time there was some decent competition for REL whose products, in my opinion, are overpriced by their importer, Sumiko. MJ subs are apparently better priced and look equally as well made (in photos), but I'd like to hear from any Audiogoners who have bought or auditiioned MJ Acoustics subs, to find out if the sound lives up to the good looks and reports.
wrightstuff
rx8man's avatar
rx8man
1,481 posts
 
Wrightstuff,
I'm in the same camp, I posted almost the same question (between Velodyne & MJ Acoustics) and came up with one answer.
I contacted MJ Acoustics, talked to a dealer & checked out their testimonials on the website and decided when I'm ready, I'll go with a pair of the REF 100's.
matchstikman
205 posts
 
Anybody have a link for MJ Acoustics where I can find more details?
bradz's avatar
bradz
229 posts
 
I also would like to know if anyone has compared a MJ Acoustic sub to the REL's, particularrly the Strata III. I'm going to use a sub with magnepan 1.6's. Matchstikman the MJ Acoustics website is here: www.mjacoustics.co.uk .
dgplo
76 posts
 
I have a rel b3 -- it mates really well with maggies --- very fast and tight, without being bloaty. I have heard that MJ does a good job with their subs, I have not had one in my room.
More to discover