I have a Trivista 300 integrated, an A3.2 cd player and the V3 tube buffer. I may just be suseptable to the "salesmans yarn" but I was told by a couple of MF dealers in different parts of the country that the only difference between a Trivista SACD player and any of the MF players from the A3.2 on up coupled with the V3 Tube buffer is the ability to play SACD.
They claimed the transport/DAC in the stand alone players is the same as the TriVista SACD, and the tube section in the V3 is the same as the tube output section as the TriVista. None of this really mattered to me because there is no way I could afford the Trivista 300 I bought used on AudioGon and a TriVista SACD player as well.
Now before I get blasted, I'm only repeating what the salesman were saying. I have never compaired the specs with a fine toothed comb. I do however think the tube buffer makes any MF cd player sound beyond much better. I had a Sim Moon Nova and it could'nt hold up to the MF tube buffer setup, which was in total half the cost of the Sim.
Hope my 2 cents helps you a bit. Compairing and auditioning
equipment is half the fun of the hobbie. Good luck.
They claimed the transport/DAC in the stand alone players is the same as the TriVista SACD, and the tube section in the V3 is the same as the tube output section as the TriVista. None of this really mattered to me because there is no way I could afford the Trivista 300 I bought used on AudioGon and a TriVista SACD player as well.
Now before I get blasted, I'm only repeating what the salesman were saying. I have never compaired the specs with a fine toothed comb. I do however think the tube buffer makes any MF cd player sound beyond much better. I had a Sim Moon Nova and it could'nt hold up to the MF tube buffer setup, which was in total half the cost of the Sim.
Hope my 2 cents helps you a bit. Compairing and auditioning
equipment is half the fun of the hobbie. Good luck.