Musical Fidelity A3 vs A3.2 Integrated?

Has anyone done an A/B on these? How much difference is there between these two? I'm looking to drive a pair of Dynaudio 52s

marccummings02-08-2004 3:57am

stevenkc Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 49 posts 02-09-2004 at 01:31am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete S7horton, you are correct. i.e., the A300 is that much more bang for the buck!
idiot9dc4 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 2 posts 02-22-2004 at 07:55pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete I have the a3.2 cd player and integrated amp. They drive a pair of Dynaudio Contour 1.3 mkII. I would definetely choose the 3.2 because it beats the older a3 on al fronts.
doodleboytoyb266 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 20 posts 02-25-2004 at 03:10am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete I am in the same boat. Which one is better. My choices are MF A3cr amp + pre separates MF A3.2cr amp + pre separates MF A308 integrated Which one is best of the money? I heard the A3cr is teh darkest. Will be running 803N on these
pmd Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 1 posts 09-04-2004 at 10:25am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete A3 sims to play with dynaudio nice, but it is not good idea to make partners. For A3 better partners are for example Vienna Acoustics Mozart or Proac 125 9depend what you like). If you are looking for amp. to yours Dyna, you should look for other amps. (For me it plays weel for example with NAD).