My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


128x128jays_audio_lab
dracule1,
OK, I respect your observations of the Wisdom Audio Adrenaline.  I don't know that model, but a few years ago I heard the Sage series.  However, my impressions of all Apogee ribbon models I heard is that they were excessively smooth, kind of like old school tube amps, and markedly rolled off in HF.  Yes, lacking in RESOLUTION, not hyper-resolution.  (There is no such thing as hyper-resolution in an accurate speaker without quirky frequency anomalies.)  The reason is the LARGE ribbons.  A large panel of any driver, whether electrostatic, ribbon, planar magnetic will create off axis HF rolloff from the edges to your ears.  This is why the Stax F83 was rolled off compared to the F81--the tall F83 created large off axis HF rolloff from the high vertical parts.  But a NARROW quarter inch ribbon won't create any horizontal HF rolloff, because that ribbon has full HF delivery way off axis.  But there is still the problem of the large vertical height.  Line source promotional material still ignores the HF loss from higher vertical "segments".  Even though at ear level you are getting everything, and you can stand and still get everything if there are vertical segments at ear level, if you do some integral calculus you see that the taller the driver, the more off axis segments there are, creating more HF rolloff.  Also, sitting too close to a tall line source magnifies the angle of off axis, creating more HF rolloff and a tonal balance shifted to the bass.  The remarkable thing about the ML CLX is that it has the highest resolution of any commercial speaker available, except for the flat panel KingSound King.  The fact that the CLX can attain this excellent resolution DESPITE one curved panel, leads me to speculate about how great the CLX would be if they just straightened the curve out.  That would be a testament to ML's superior membrane/stator technology, if only they straightened it.  The disadvantage of the very tall and wide King is the off-axis vertical dispersion I just spoke about.  The CLX is a reasonable height and width, to get a focused, non bloated image.  My ideal speaker would be a near point source quarter inch square electrostatic to yield no off-axis rolloff, and I would be the size of an insect to hear the delicate tiny volume sound.  But the size of the CLX is a reasonable compromise to get enough volume with minimized rolloff.

By the way, someone recently had a valid point that the larger electrostatic membrane enables less excursion than a smaller membrane for the same volume level.  Less excursion would create even more linearity and less distortion.  However, I believe that the disadvantage of the HF rolloff effect of the larger membrane outweighs the benefit of less excursion in the large membrane.


Greyhound: I agree with your comments about the highs. That said, I think there’s one element here that we are all not mentioning: we need to allow our ears to adjust to the new sound. I believe that there needs to be an adjustment period in which your ears need to capture what’s happening. When I first sat down to hear the Neolith I felt like the highs lacked detail. I moved them forward about a foot and more detail began to emerge. 
This speaker is the only speaker I’ve owned that makes you feel as if the mids are floating in the air between the speakers. The size of the instruments is much larger; The mid bass is present and with lots of energy. The bass is more than you could ask for. 
Whats the biggest drawback so far? Well it’s that the speaker is like a huge canvas. It will expose everything you draw on it and will let you hear it. If you enjoy older recordings that aren’t perfect then be prepared to hear them not so perfect to the point that you feel as if the speaker sounds like sh@t. 
Is it as dynamic as a Wilson Audio? No it is not but it is more dynamic than any other electrostatic I’ve owned. No speaker has been more dynamic than Wilson. Not even magico. Wilson audio had dynamics that sometimes made you jump out of your chair. However, the bass was another story...
my biggest issue I believe is power. I need serious juice and current. I will tell you that if you all lived close by and wanted to have my opinion about how good is the bass on an amp you have, I’d tell you to bring it and connect it to the Neolith. You would find out right away. 
For those of you who don’t know, the Neolith does not have powered woofers. It has passive 15 inch and 12 inch drivers. the amp needs to do all the work. 
grey9hound, we addressed this subject before.  I explained my perspective of close up listening.  You may never have had this experience, or you just happen to prefer laid back sound, like some people who like pasta soggy rather than al dente.  All different tastes, which is OK, but realize you are missing much true HF info which is NOT piercing if volumes are at sensible levels.  I know that for your music, you like to play it loud which you can't tolerate from amps that deliver full HF detail and extension.  But that is not about true high fidelity, which means low distortion at natural volume levels, not cranked.
@Viber6
That is your opinion, which , of course is wrong . I am not missing HF info. It is all there .
WC,
For your priorities of dynamics plus good purity, I think the Neo is the best speaker for you.  As a hybrid, it gives you everything you want.  For those who want the ultimate in clarity and are willing to sacrifice some  bass and overall dynamics, the CLX is better.  Do you remember the mid/HF characteristics of the CLX to compare it with the Neo?  I believe that you liked the CLX even when they were closer to the back wall than your Neo is now.  Just imagine the clarity, fresh air and space you would have if you listened to the CLX at the 5 foot distance.  I also am guessing that you thought the bass on the CLX was adequate because they were a lot closer to the wall and got bass reinforcement from that closeness.  At 5 feet, you would probably find the CLX to have inadequate bass.  Then the ultimate system would be the CLX positioned at 5 feet, plus REL woofer, although the Neo would probably still have more dynamics throughout the entire frequency range because of the larger woofers and panels.