Hi,
I currently own a ML335, ML380S, RA55, Dunlavy SCIV, PS Audio 600 in the same system. I had a ML332, and tried a ML38, ML38S before the ML380S. I have run the RA 55 directly into the ML332 and ML335 as well as through each of the pre-amps.
I found that the RA55 loses detail and dynamics without the preamp. I thought the ML38 was worthless in the system. I bought it to upgrade to the ML380S($2650).
Running the CD thought the ML38 was worse than nothing. The ML38S was slightly better and the ML380S was clearly better.
The real issue appears to be the voltage output of the 39 which I believe is 5 volts vs 16 volts for the 380S.
I was hoping I wouldn't like the ML380S because I figured I save $4000+ by reselling it. Didn't work out as planned.
Good luck.
Bill Eichengrun
I currently own a ML335, ML380S, RA55, Dunlavy SCIV, PS Audio 600 in the same system. I had a ML332, and tried a ML38, ML38S before the ML380S. I have run the RA 55 directly into the ML332 and ML335 as well as through each of the pre-amps.
I found that the RA55 loses detail and dynamics without the preamp. I thought the ML38 was worthless in the system. I bought it to upgrade to the ML380S($2650).
Running the CD thought the ML38 was worse than nothing. The ML38S was slightly better and the ML380S was clearly better.
The real issue appears to be the voltage output of the 39 which I believe is 5 volts vs 16 volts for the 380S.
I was hoping I wouldn't like the ML380S because I figured I save $4000+ by reselling it. Didn't work out as planned.
Good luck.
Bill Eichengrun