At least he bought them, listened to them and determined they are not for him. Unlike what you did on several other threads.
- ...
- 135 posts total
It's usually DACs that test the limits of the Audio Precision analyzers. I've never heard NAD purifi amps but I have heard the Purifi modules as well as different hypex and Pascal implementations. They've all sounded good to me as in I couldn't attribute a sound to them but then again I don't have bat ears. |
Yeah, twice, lol... I don’t consider or buy audio components from manufacturers who won’t provide measurements. I screen products by their objective performance and if this data isn’t forthcoming, they are ignored. Those that publish and meet certain requirements are auditioned. That’s my approach. Many state of the art amp manufacturers publish their performance data. I look at such transparency as excellent customer service and appreciate companies that give the complete picture to their potential customers who value such data. Not everyone cares, which is their business. I do, and that’s mine. |
@djones51 |
Wait, wasn’t this just copied and pasted from the ASR website? For those who can’t judge for themselves or trust their own ears I can see this being gospel. And please, when Gene publishes their “objective” subjective review by all means post that too along with the Crutchfield review when that comes out. All those who need to be told what sounds good will greatly appreciate it. |
- 135 posts total