Avanti1960 1-2-2017I would try a much higher value than 100 ohms. The need for heavy resistive loading is driven primarily by the sensitivity of the particular phono stage to radio frequencies, that can be introduced as a result of the resonant peak in frequency response that occurs at RF with LOMCs due to the interaction of cartridge inductance and load capacitance (load capacitance referring to the sum of the capacitances of the phono cable and tonearm wiring, and the input capacitance of the particular phono stage).
I have the loading at 100 ohms.... the dynamics are not as good as i thought they would be though compared to my dynavector 20X2L.
Several experts, including Keith Herron and Lyra cartridge designer Jonathan Carr, have stated that loading a LOMC with a lower resistance value than necessary can compromise dynamics. I’m running my ART9 with a Herron VTPH-2 phono stage using its "infinite loading" provision (which presents the cartridge with a load resistance value that is MUCH higher than even 47K), which draws essentially zero current from the cartridge, and just responds to the voltage it is putting out. Dynamics have been great!
Frank (Oregonpapa) has found 100 ohms to provide great results, but I note that his phono stage (the ARC PH-8) has a specified 3 db bandwidth of 400 kHz, which I believe to be exceptionally wide for a phono stage. The result very conceivably being that in the absence of that heavy load the phono stage and/or components further downstream may be exposed to greater amounts of energy in the RF region than would usually be the case. So depending on what phono stage you are using his results stand a good chance of not being applicable to your system.
Regards,
-- Al