Perfect Path Technologies: Omega E mat

djones51 sez ...

• "I already know it’s properties. It makes hifi systems sound out of this world at $600 a pop."
  

That’s exactly correct.

I’ve heard Steve Fleschler’s system after applying Total Contact. I have yet to hear his system with the Omega E Mats. He has heard my system with both the TC applications and the E Mats, and that’s what prompted him to advance his system by buying and installing the mats.

As for my own system, it is now way beyond where I ever thought a home system could go. I’m discovering new applications for the mats too. Just placing one under my power conditioner the other day made a significant improvement ... and that’s after having two in the circuit breaker box and one under each component in the system.

One thing we should all remember is that this is a hobby and its intended for fun and musical enjoyment.

And talking about musical enjoyment, here’s something I threw on the CD spinner this morning. If you like purity in female voice and ballad standards, this is one not to miss:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/CAROL-KIDD-GOLD-1995-MADE-IN-THE-UK-24K-GOLD-CD/252641905971?hash=item3ad2a...

Yes, its a collector item now. Expensive too. I bought mine when it was new for $18.00. Maybe if you keep looking, or are really fortunate to run across it at a garage sale .... :>)

Frank

Goodness you are relentless in your speculative view. Just consider other possible realities and approaches as they may have some wisdom and that is how we learn. Agreed?

@grannyring- If that is addressed to me, I understand exactly what you are saying about patents. Exactly. By your own words-"Sometimes a patent is not the best approach. Sometimes. Not always or even often." So, in your opinion, no patent is the best approach for this invention based on the premise a patent would lay bare the composition and technology of the mat, making it easier for others to change slightly and emulate, else they would have no clue as to how to do it. That is your opinion. I am of the opinion that since it is not a piece of technology that I surmise needs specialized machinery or expensive custom tooling to produce, (since, you know, it’s a mat) a patent would be better protection than no patent at all. Especially since as I stated, the material can easily be analyzed and identified. Of course, we’re both just speculating and voicing our opinions. So I ask, what makes your speculations and opinions more valid than my or djones51’s ’laughable’ ones?