Pros/Cons of Same Length Speaker Cables?


Like many others, my amplifier, cd player, rack, etc. is off to the side rather than between the two speakers. This means the cable length is different for each. I've heard some (dealers!) say the cable lengths should be identical for both speakers. Aside from the cost issue for good cables, isn't it bad to have too much cable coiled up behind the rack? Why have identical lengths if it means one of the speaker cables has more than 6 extra feet coiled up? I know that resistance can be an issue, but is this really an issue with one cable at 16' and the other at 9'? Thanks in advance for your advice
amenhotep
Another consideration, even if you ignore the possibility of performance loss, is resale. More people than not, expect that a pair of interconnects or speaker cables will be a matched length. Personally, I have not found a little extra wire coiled up behind one speaker to be any worse than the difference that exists in the lengths being different. Many times too, the shortening of the length in only one of the pair of wires, does not get you much in the way of dollars saved. Just some things to consider, you must decide what is best for you.
In my experience depending on the cables, length may affect the sound. If your cables are affected by length, then the sound will not be balanced and/or may not sound the same. Another reason to get the same length.
Speaker cables transmit power from your amps. The cables are in fact acting as capacitors, that is they store power which your speakers will draw on during those demanding passages in the music. Makes sense to have both cables the same length and a minimum of 8 feet long.