PS Audio PWD MKII HiFi Tuning fuse direction

Hk_fan wrote,

"It doesn't make a difference in cables or fuses. Electrons do not care what arrow direction a manufacturer may put on a label."

Electrons don't carry the signal so I suspect we can probably rule that particular theory out. In fact, electrons in the conductor are kind of just sitting there, drifting along at a couple centimeters a minute.

GK
MD

The differences in directionality are only reported in a DC circuit. The AC measurement do not have a direction 1 and direction 2 measurement, because in an AC circuit there is no directionality. The flow of current changes direction 60 times per second.

Even the difference in directionality in the DC circuit are methodologically suspect.

First, the report does not say if the best measurement for the allegedly directional fuses correspond with the recommended direction. If you do two measurements there will always be a random difference between two measurements. To proof directionality, you need a batch of allgedly directional fuses, measure each one multiple time and show that the recommended direction measures better within statistical margins of error. There is no indication at all this is what they did. The report does not even say what the standard diviation is for the measurements, and therefore you cannot tell whether or not the differences are statisically significant or random.

Second, the difference between direction 1 and direction 2 measurement is higher in the non directional cheap fuses, than in the allegedly directional high end fuses. If the expensive fuses were explicitly designed to be directional, you would expect the exact opposite.

In conclusion, directionality of fuses in AC circuit is bogus, and in DC circuit highly suspect.

10-22-12: Geoffkait
I suspect one need look no further than the measured data for fuses of various types, including standard and HiFi Tuning, to see that fuses not only measure differently but are directional electrically.

Geoff, I had provided detailed comments on a similar set of measurements from the same folks in the recent "Fuses That Matter" thread, in my post dated 5-14-12. The bottom line:

IMO they provide the basis for a good case as to why fuse upgrades shouldn't make a difference, or at least a difference that is necessarily for the better.... I don't exclude the possibility that a fuse change can make a difference, but once again the explanations that are offered in support of the existence of those differences do not withstand quantitative scrutiny.

I would add to my comments in the other thread that one could take two identical examples of a specific model of any given electronic component, such as a preamplifier, amplifier, digital source, etc., and find within it countless examples of parts such as resistors, capacitors, transistors or tubes, integrated circuits, etc., having greater and arguably more significant measurable differences between the characteristics and parameters of corresponding parts in the two supposedly identical components.

The existence of a measurable difference does not by any means necessarily imply the existence of an audibly significant difference. And if there is an audibly significant difference, it does not by any means necessarily imply that the measured difference is the reason.

Regards,
-- Al

"Electrons don't carry the signal so I suspect we can probably rule that particular theory out. In fact, electrons in the conductor are kind of just sitting there, drifting along at a couple centimeters a minute. "

With all due respect, you don't know what you're talking about.

Al, I believe the fuse data to which I provided a link above is new and different from the previous data under discussion a while back inasmuch as the new measured differences are much more pronounced. Of course, measured differences might not be audible but if someone is looking for a smoking gun, this new data is just that! I don't get it, if you can measure it and you can hear it, what else is left to be so skeptical about? Seems silly.

GK
MD