10-23-12: GeoffkaitA lot of it is new, presenting data on different fuse types in many cases. But I don't see any major differences between the two sets of data, or anything that would change the comments I provided either above or in the other thread (aside from the fact that the vector impedance data that I had indicated was missing from the other paper has now been added).
Al, I believe the fuse data to which I provided a link above is new and different from the previous data under discussion a while back inasmuch as the new measured differences are much more pronounced.
All of the text in the new paper that provides interpretations of the data is identical to text that appeared in the other paper. Including, btw, the remarkable admission that the worst case power loss due to voltage drop across any of the fuses is very small in comparison to typical variations in line voltage of average 3%. A point I had made early on in the other thread. In regard to which I also pointed out that if the line voltage at the users location happens to be higher than the line voltage at which the component was developed and voiced, the larger voltage drops of the standard fuses will be in the direction of helping, not hurting, if in fact they have any audible consequences at all.
Concerning the directionality-related measurements specifically, in addition to the good comments Edorr has provided in his last couple of posts I will repeat a basic point I made in the other thread:
If per my comment and Roger [Modjeski's] comments the OVERALL resistance for both directions is insignificant, the DIFFERENCE in resistance between the two orientations will certainly be insignificant.In any event, my comment in this thread that you originally were responding to was:
Some will say that fuses are directional because energy is being transferred through them in just one direction, or because during manufacture the conductive material they contain was "drawn" in a certain direction. WHETHER OR NOT [emphasis added] fuses in fact have any directional characteristics, the relevance of those facts is IMO speculative at best, and most likely unprovable.I don't see anything in either set of data which calls that statement into question.
Regards,
-- Al