2. amps-preamps
  3. 162284-76532

Purifi Class D: Junk?

So, from the previous thread about high-end class D the Purifi module was brought up. I decided to get a cheap example from VTV, a simple stereo unit with a single Purifi module and matching Hypex SMPS. Standard input buffer. I got it in yesterday. First impression wasn't what I was expecting: weak, congested dynamics is what stood out to me. I expected greater expression through my ProAc D30Rs. The other problems such as poor soundstage, thin / boring character, etc, I marked up to needing burn-in before evaluating. So it's been 24 hours, I would still expect to get at least the high control / damping of high end class D and dynamic power, but it's just not present.

Could it be an impedance mismatch? Other manufacturers selling the Purifi with their custom input buffers are reporting 47k Ohms. VTV doesn't say in the manual or on the site. I checked the Purifi data sheet which reports...2.2k Ohms on SE???? That can't be right?? That's absurdly low! Am I reading the right spec? My preamp has an output impedance of 230 Ohms. Can someone confirm that the stock Purifi has this ultra-low input impedance?
madavid0
ricevs
1,543 posts
 
The VTV input buffer board is pretty much the same as Nord's.  However, VTV offers more op amp options and the amps cost less and have a 30 day money back in the US...............and you can buy their version of the Purifi evaluator amp for less than $1000 delivered.
oldhvymec
5,101 posts
 
The VTV input buffer board is pretty much the same as Nord’s. However, VTV offers more op amp options and the amps cost less

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<,>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Actually I did a visual side by side. The Nord is a much better made board, by no small margin either, NO copper foil resistors, and SLOPPY, solder joints. Second the Nord Rev. D has the greater options. You can not use the Sparco 2590s, or other pro op amp options.

Either buffer can use the smaller op amps, SI, or Sparco, a few of the Class A op amps..

The Wiess op amp is HUGE and has a proprietary mount, that only it can use. The cost of that buffer and opamp is the most expensive you can buy. The funny part the guy that sells the VTV boards admits the Nord with 2590s sound better and cost LESS. 1/3 less. 274.xx (Euro) 323.xx usd

He took back the VTV board, I got from him. I thought the option for Wiess was for TWO.
It is for one board 442.xx usd. Over 100.00 usd difference AND the guy that makes the VTV likes the Sparco better, ASK HIM... I think both use Sparco Voltage regulators. Nord does..

Regards
oldhvymec
5,101 posts
 
The one thing I did dig out of the thread is, I need to pick up a pair of Nord built Purifi 1ET400A, with Nord buffers and Sparco 2590. He'll give me a deal.

I own 9 of his NC500. I bought 5 from him. 3 pairs of MBs and one X3 NC500 with trigger and 3 x PS (no sharing). ALL use 1200/700 PS. All but 2 have rev. d boards (rev c). Let's say we have a rapport. 
My 3X was the first to roll off the line with rev d boards and multi Mono rail within a single enclosures, withOUT shared (or compromised) PS 1200/700. Serious piece of gear..

Now to modify the fuse circuit. It needs to be inline and remove the onboard 15 and add a 20 amp iec copper/silver non fuse female.

These are great sounding units with small planars MUCH better than any of the earlier 400/500/700. I really didn't like that sound as ALL.

The buffer made all the difference in the world for me.. BUT then I like tone control, Mcintosh and VMPS speakers. I'm one of "those guys".

To top it all off, kenjit, kicked me off his forum, I'm heart broken.. (took a while to work). Ok I all better now.. I'll quit yipin', I mean typing. :-)

Regards
Post removed 
ricevs
1,543 posts
 
The Nord board is not better made and the VTV board has the exact same options as the Nord and VTV sells more op amp options. You can use any of the the op amps that Nord sells and more. There are no copper foil resistors on the VTV board......what the heck is a "copper foil resistor"? He uses standard metal film resistors that were tested by Andrew Sparks as having the lowest noise.
More to discover