Recommendations for speakers that sound great at lower volume levels.

Did i mention the persona b yet? Probably, for good reason tho’ $7k for bookshelves is ug, but they can be found for nearly half that including stands and with your front end they should excell, if there’s any way you could home demo a pair?

Hello guys,telling the poor man to buy Martin Logan’s,are you kidding,don’t kick the guy when he’s down,atleast now his system sounds good at higher levels,don’t strip him of that too. Don’t get me wrong,mls are wonderful for home theater,but music,ok,not the best advice.An easy way to address your problem is Less Loss makes a transformer winding you hook up to your speaker cables,right before they reach the speaker terminals. Your speaker cable attaches before the winding,then there’s about a foot wire on the opposite side that attaches to your speaker terminals. If I remember right,these change the sensitivity that your amps see from the speakers. The owner brought a pair over to my house,probably four years ago or so. These made my speakers able to really open up,with  much lower power tube amps. It was quite impressive,and sounded beautiful. I didn’t buy them from him,but always thought I probably should have. We went from 210 watt ARC Ref monos to 60 watt Atmosphere monos,and actually they sounded more powerful. I think they were about 1100$ unboxed,or 1500$ with nice finished boxes and speaker terminals. John

I have not been able to hear any of the new incarnation of KLH except the one's I bought on faith, the Kendall. The KLH 5 does indeed look like a wonderful speaker and I seem to see nothing but good press about it, but I have not seen or heard them for myself. If I can find a place to go hear them I certainly will. From everything I have read, they are the best speakers that the new KLH makes, but as we know, best for what exactly? I will say that I am quite happy with the Kendalls, so if the 5 is of a similar build and design quality, it would be quite nice. Now the only question is; how does it perform at low levels?

To further qualify my appreciation of the Kendall, I have had it for close to two years and am still quite happy with it. I listen to all sorts of music from the entire history of recorded music and it does all of that just fine, as long as I keep the volumes to reasonable levels. I have experimented a lot with placement and have settled for relatively close to side and back walls (maybe 15" from back and 2 feet from sides) which emphasizes the bass quite a bit, but at the relatively low levels I'm using, it's about right. Even though they are really good for quiet bassheads (is that even possible?) that doesn't mean the low end extension is all that deep. I think they do very little below about 35Hz. Tweeters are metal dome but not harsh to me, even when I crank them up above their sweet spot. Midrange is the best of any speaker I've ever owned, and I think that is a function of being a 3-way speaker with a modern midrange design. Imaging? Again it's fine, but it's not at the level of >$10K super-imagers. I find almost anything images well if you set it up right and sit in exactly the right spot. These are probably like most other $1.5K-3K towers on imaging, good but not above its peers.

So the KLH Kendall has its limits for sure. But it shines for me at low levels. If people say the 5 does the same, I believe them.

At least to my ears and my system the best I’ve heard at low volumes for detail and bass definition have been my sonus faber olympica 3

Thanks, Stingray26. I appreciate the effort and time you put into your response. I'll have to find out who in the North Carolina Triangle region sells KLH. I'm anxious to try them out. As I said earlier, I feel like the answer to my hifi dilemma is a high efficiency speaker (perhaps KLH or Klipsch) or a some kind of equalizer tone control, like Decware,