>>>How is Shunyata's technology really different from Kimber's?<<<
Ray makes great signal cables and offers real-world pricing. Hat's off, they
are fantastic products. However, outside of the color coding in some of the
cables and the fact there is a braid in both, there is zero similarity between
the two designs. I am sure each can be distinguished simply by viewing the
posted information on the respective web's.
Everything from the copper's CDA numbers, the cryo process, the
electromagnet process and the hand braiding, even the numbers of
conductors are all explained in detail on the Shunyata web.
>>>"Five bucks and an ink-stained napkin will get you a U.S. Patent so
don't hand me that one"<<<
Really? The patent for that specific signal geometry, which _has to be_ hand
wound belongs to physicist Tierry Budge. Another physicist, Caelin Gabriel
thought enough of it to License the patent, so you have two physicists
involved in bringing that specific tech to market. Now, whether the product
designs themselves are good, bad or indifferent each can judge, but the Helix
patent is not some frivolous "I just made Ma a new hair-net"
patent. The science is explainable, the info is available and there were no ink-
stained napkins involved. Most people that think signal or audio design
patents are cheap and easy to get and protect haven't gone through the
multi-year process to get them.
Regards,
Grant
Shunyata
Ray makes great signal cables and offers real-world pricing. Hat's off, they
are fantastic products. However, outside of the color coding in some of the
cables and the fact there is a braid in both, there is zero similarity between
the two designs. I am sure each can be distinguished simply by viewing the
posted information on the respective web's.
Everything from the copper's CDA numbers, the cryo process, the
electromagnet process and the hand braiding, even the numbers of
conductors are all explained in detail on the Shunyata web.
>>>"Five bucks and an ink-stained napkin will get you a U.S. Patent so
don't hand me that one"<<<
Really? The patent for that specific signal geometry, which _has to be_ hand
wound belongs to physicist Tierry Budge. Another physicist, Caelin Gabriel
thought enough of it to License the patent, so you have two physicists
involved in bringing that specific tech to market. Now, whether the product
designs themselves are good, bad or indifferent each can judge, but the Helix
patent is not some frivolous "I just made Ma a new hair-net"
patent. The science is explainable, the info is available and there were no ink-
stained napkins involved. Most people that think signal or audio design
patents are cheap and easy to get and protect haven't gone through the
multi-year process to get them.
Regards,
Grant
Shunyata