Sistrum or Neuance or...?

That New Zealander knows his tuning, I have to say..............

But I reckon the idea of light and rigid, to make sure energy stored is minimised and released quickly, is in natural conflict with the concept of damping. By its nature damping tries to absorb energy and not return it later, but that is a difficult ideal to achieve in practise. It is in this trade-off that I feel there is as much art as science - finding the trade-off that does the least damage to the music. The reason why I like the items closest to the component to be damped or even compliant (in the case of the feet) is because the component needs to be both isolated from vibrations by the total structure, but also damped.

Within the subject of similarity, I could not find any accusations of Sistrum snake-oil in the 2001 thread, which I consider an issue separate from shilling. Another, more amusing similarity is Robert Maicks having the exact same time constraints. I have to say the amount of irony is has broken my meter, including me "opening the door" for another Twl promotion.

PS - Being newer to audio than Sistrum, its not that I am biased by products or ideas that have been around longer, if that matters to anyone. I own audiopoints.

TWL Promotions presents...

He needs that *mature* waitress. This past Sunday afternoon I was called to work all night and I went to the 24 hr diner. Yes!, those *mature* waitresses are in shape from all that walking back & forth. Not the prettiest faces, but I'm shure performancewise they will not dissapoint any *mature* man with adequate stamina. Start skipping rope, Tom!

Actually, I'm not in very bad shape. I could use a couple more miles a day on the track.

Thanks for the "promotional opportunity".

This hydra type of thread refuses to die. The more someone tries to kill it, the more heads it grows. As someone lacking techinical knowledge but a firm believer that the right rack makes or breaks a system, I love it!