Speakers The single most critical component


I know we've been over this Q hundreds of X's over the past 20 years here on audion, You can find dozen of topics dealing with this Q <which is the ,,,,most important component...>>
well time for yet 1 more topic dealing with this,, perhaps unanswered, un-resolved issue.
I'm bringing up the old hachet due to my recent experience acutally hearinga FR in my system. 
Let me tell you, there is not even 1 traditional/conventioanl/xover design <The Boxed Type>> in the world that could convince me  , there is something that will beat out FR (caveat, FR requires  some sort of high sens =sensitivity, tweeter)  in  the Boxy world of speakers.
That is to say, FR + Compression Horn is the future of 21st Century high fidelity. 
One lab has already brought us these ~~~SHF~~~ aka SuperHighFidelity  single drivers. 
The code word here is ~~SHF~~~ which can not never be employed when describing xover/trad/conventioanl style  aka The Box designs. db level under 91 are _<<IN-EFFICIENT>> , = dysfunctional, out dated, old school , = Dinasaurs. 
For amps, I only consider tube amps (PP and SET) as ~~SHF~~~ I can not include ss amps in this topic. 
IMHO all well made tube amps sound very close,
 a  kt88 in brand X will sound  close to brand Y. 
So amplification takes a  distant 2nd place in critical component.  No need to break the bank buying amp A vs  a  lower priced kt88 amp B
CD players, nearly all  tube DAC's , tube cdp-ers sound  close. No need to braek the bank over X vs Y.
My Jadis DAC is  only miniscule gain over the Shanling,
 the Shanling
only a  miniscule gain over the Cayin CD17. 
Now as for  best source  , phonograph is the ideal playback medium vs cds. 
I have some LP's now , but my main collection are classical cds, most not on LP version. Cables , I did note some gains employing silver/copper wiring throughout my entire system including inside the Defy.
Tweak worthy.
New Mundorf caps in all componets, tweak worthy. 
Yet the main central component remaisn the speakers.
Here is where  the entire audio resolution either rises to Nirvana or falls to <<distortion/muddy waters,/pollution/anti-fidelity  voicing  issues.
Your system's fidelity is ultimately dependent on what speaker  you have chosen to employ.
Forget all you've learned over the years, 
The new mantra is <,The speaker is key component>
All else is just extra tweaks/nuances. 
To sum up, a  ~~SHF~~ driver will match even the top of line Wilson weighing in at hundreds of lbs priced $$$$$$$ overa single FR driver. 
FR beats out any/all xover box design speakers. Mostly due to that key specification ~~db level~~~ which is everything in speaker design and thus in resolution/fidelity. 

mozartfan
Kinda makes amplifier choice crucial to the system performance in my book.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not in my limited experience, as i stated earlier, 
Richard's 2 loan tube amps, performed quite well vs the much more pricey and beefier Defy7. 
It was not like night/day difference.
The 3 digital souces , had close performance.
It was the Diatone FR vs the xover/box design  which revealed a  wide margin in performance.
From this test,  seems to me  : all tube amplification requires a  high sensitivity speaker.
Futher my testing does not take in the idea, SET amplification is  The Ideal power source for wide band drivers. 
SET amps as we all know have  limitations,.. these   flaws tend to surface   when it comes to certain styles of music.
I'm not buying  in the idea SET's are superior in wide band speakers.
When my  2nd FR arrives in a few weeks, I'll see if Richard will loan out his *treasured* SET amps.
I doubt it,
But this way I could get a  real experience of these 2 beautiful  tube amplifiers in a high sens speaker. 

I'm not buying in the idea SET's are superior in wide band speakers. 

ZSeems the SET amplification has been officially coveted as the only amplification for the task.


I rest my case.
I rest my case.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well yeah  i did make a few bold daring opinions. ,
 seems I just now ran into a very interesting amplifier to match perfectly (priced right and weigth perfect)
while doing other research
I had heard of Decware, but not investigated.
This really looks like it would make a dif in sonics vs the Defy.
Some things you can just look at and feel its different.
hummm I just might list my Defy,,,,,as i really do not need 100 watts a channel, as i listen at low gain


https://www.decware.com/newsite/TORIIJR.html

Pity can not find many YT uploads on this amp, 
Also does not have my fav imput tubes in the pre section, the 12AU and 12AX. 
For me, tahtsa  big issue. 
Back with my Defy, I'm thinking once i get a  wide band 8 in, I will better make the judgement about PP paired with wide band/high sensitivity single source driver.
3 weeks.
I would advise all newbies to NOT make any decision to purchase  any piece of equipemnt, until you have spent time in research, Not always the case though, 
 The caveat here is, when/if you see a  Jadis intergrated on the market, do not hesitate, or it will go in  a  flash. 
Best bang.