The Audio Science Review (ASR) approach to reviewing wines.


Imagine doing a wine review as follows - samples of wines are assessed by a reviewer who measures multiple variables including light transmission, specific gravity, residual sugar, salinity, boiling point etc.  These tests are repeated while playing test tones through the samples at different frequencies.

The results are compiled and the winner selected based on those measurements and the reviewer concludes that the other wines can't possibly be as good based on their measured results.  

At no point does the reviewer assess the bouquet of the wine nor taste it.  He relies on the science of measured results and not the decidedly unscientific subjective experience of smell and taste.

That is the ASR approach to audio - drinking Kool Aid, not wine.

toronto416

Well I guess since Amir admits he listens to less than 50% of the products he reviews, those who believe a proper review can be conducted without listening, should be comfortable with ASR's methods. To me even the suggestion of a review based simply on measurements should cause even the faithful to run for the hills.

 

@cleeds

Exactly - ASR is ridiculous biased - biased for Topping, biased against pricey equipment. I had two different Topping DACs - both were DOA so please measure that POS. 

@chenry

"the results are open for comment. NO! They are not open for comment. If your comment does not match their philosophy you are thrown off.

 

Here's how you know ASR is borderline useless. There'd be a new product, and the ASR people would dissect and read all the data, and then something magical happen.

They all wait for subjective user experience.

If your scientific measurements are not reliable, then what are we even doing here?

Point at a random well measured speakers, the fact that no one can confidently say it will undeniably sound good by just looking at the data alone, that is troublesome.