"
So I’ve been thinking. With the purchase of the amps it would be hard to squeeze in the 7’s. Think I should just stick with what I have for now and just save for 3.7 or the 7.2. 7.2 might be better cause of the mineral polymer baffle instead of straight cement."
The 7.2s are harder to drive than the 3.7s and of course are not as efficient (7.2s were tested by a magazine at 85.5 and 3.7s were tested at 90.7). Remember, that some 7.2s could be upgraded 7s (and I'm not sure if all 7.2s had the composite baffle or early ones had the concrete one). The concrete baffle weighs a bit more (I think about 15pounds or so per speaker so it is about 155 lbs vs 170).
The 7.2s will play a bit lower than the 3.7s (but not tons, depending on the room). They sound different. I'd think that some people heavy into classical music could prefer the 7.2s but the 3.7s are smoother.
The 7.2s are harder to drive than the 3.7s and of course are not as efficient (7.2s were tested by a magazine at 85.5 and 3.7s were tested at 90.7). Remember, that some 7.2s could be upgraded 7s (and I'm not sure if all 7.2s had the composite baffle or early ones had the concrete one). The concrete baffle weighs a bit more (I think about 15pounds or so per speaker so it is about 155 lbs vs 170).
The 7.2s will play a bit lower than the 3.7s (but not tons, depending on the room). They sound different. I'd think that some people heavy into classical music could prefer the 7.2s but the 3.7s are smoother.