Top brand speakers

I am only posting this in reply to your question Zd.

Statements like Marantz, Arcam, etc are 2 dimensional but Pass Labs, Onkyo, etc are 3 dimensional. We have heard this over and over again Zd and just not restricted to the above brands I site. I have never seen a spec for dimensionality for an amp in over 30 years. Yet, he repeats these statements like gospel. So where the written proof? There is none - its subjective opinion.

How about this most recent example...

"If you have all my knowledge and compared all the stuff I did you don't even want Naim for free in your house.
I can easilly overrule their sound and quality. I have proven this more than ones."

His words, not mine. He says he proven it. So show us. How exactly do you overrule Naims sound and quality? And don't say by 16 years of listening which is the usual retort. That's not proof - again, its subjective hyperbole.

I am not the one who is crying. Other people cry because they do not like my personal opinion. So who is crying? Do not turn it around.

It is my personal opinion that Naim is not good enough in depth and wide. It is not the best in blacks compared to other brands like Pass. It is not that good in individual intimate focus. This is how I see it. I never heard any of my client when I did a demo and explained the differences between this and Naim. Never any word.

Who is cryring?

The one who become personal

"Without getting into who's right or wrong, what do you mean by written proof? Proof of what?"

Bo has claimed that he has been best "absolute" sound at at least one show many many times. I recently asked him in a post about this basically pointing out that here at least in the US and even Europe, if you are best in show, you'll be written about on various websites. I asked for the name of the show(s) that he was given this title and for any links (foreign languages are even okay) of website mentions but never received a response. I'm still interested if Bo is reading this.

I've never posted but always wondered why, if Monitor Audio was aware of his methodology, which he claims they are and am impressed with it, why aren't they using the exact approach in all their demos and shows? Maybe they are and I don't know it, but if they are, the sound doesn't seem to be impressing people because no one except Bo is talking about it.

I know I've also had at least one other post in the past year asking for some specific verifiable objective evidence of one of his claims, but there was no answer.

That said, I find his posts very interesting and entertaining.

I read this. Send an email to: info@monitoraudio.nl

Ask them about the show in Veldhoven 2013. And ask them the email address of the persons who were at the show of Monitor Audio england.

I cannot make it more clear.

I asked Monitor Audio England why they did choose brands at shows ( which I never would use or sell) which are not the best options.

They said: political choiches. What can I say. This I really hate. I was asked for demos a few years as well by Monitor Audio. I only had the options to use the amps and sources they choose.

I said: even if you pay me 100.000 euro I will not do it.

I am only intrested when I have the freedom to choose. Last years I had. I used my own set. To be honest this made it very simple to win.