Tubes or Solid State?????


Thinking of upgrading from my Tandberg separates to either a Pathos Classic MKII Integrated, Primaluna Integrated or the Krell KAV400 solid state. I'm intrigued by the Pathos mixture of solid state and tube technology, and curious of the Primaluna all tube approach but I am drawn to the Krells offing of 200wpc as well. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
dreadhead
if your tandbergs are the 3000 series, i don't think you will have any revalations switching. onthe otherhand the laterday 4000 series were not the best tandberg made. 10 years from now, the tandbergs will still be considered classic performers
I had a Pathos Classic II for awhile. It is the one component that I regret having sold. Have tried the Primaluna. It is nice, but not up to the Pathos.
A fellow audiophile who likes to tweek his system replaced a many-tubed Cary amp with a TRL solid state amp. Those of us who listened noticed improvement in transparency and imaging.

db
I would add Rogue Audio to your list. I have a Krell Ksa-250 and Rogue Audio tube amps.

The Ksa-250 and another Krell amp (Kav-500) were part of my multichannel system. When I broke that system up I sold off the Kav-500 and bought the Rogue amps.

I like the Rogue monos a lot...I would expect the Rogue integrated amps have the same sound signature...ie, solid state like in bass and hi freq's...tube bloom in midrange freq's.

Really, you need to match your amp with your speakers...plus, factor in the type of sound your going after for "That" system. Solid state amps sound different...tube amps even more so.

Dave