Better than the speakers in a treated room looking out of ABQ, would be in front of a window in the more alpines or north NM… 😎
I’m tempted to clear the room of all the treatment and see what kind of sound I can get just by tuning the speakers.
The treatments that do bass are usually thick, or they are Helmholz resonators, bass traps, etc.
The thinner treatments on walls usually kick in at 100 or 200 Hz on up. So one either using things like the Vandy subs with tuning pots, or a DSP based like MiniDSP or Lyngdorf for the < 200 Hz region.
And using something like REW to get decay times and see what the modes are can help to try and get the treatments to address the problems. And also seeing the early reflection peaks,
Usually when one talks about whether active or passive methods are superior it is black-n-white argument. The best systems usually use passive methods, and layer in some active controls to get the rest of the way.
An example would be active cancellation in a headphone.
We can reduce the SPL by 15-25 dB passively with earmuffs.
If we tried to do that at 20dB actively we would need to be within 1% (or maybe it is 3% if we are doing 10log10 versus 20log10). That gets hard to do.
If we are within 10%, then we can get 10dB pretty easily, and that 10dB layers on top of the 15-25dB of the passive.
Basically I think that you will want some of your treatments to stay, and corner treatments may change to bass treatments. But some measurements might help to work through it. And I doubt that the treatments are helping a lot in the bass, but they might.
My son and I will be driving up through Tierra Amarilla to retrieve the speakers next week.
FYI: The donut munchers in Southern Co have little tolerance for speeds over the posted limit.