I posted:
+++ " It helps that we use a R2R as reference/comparison?, certainly yes ... " +++
I think I was plain wrong, certainly does not helps because a important part of the LP recording process is not on the tape, example: RIAA eq de-emphasis, cutting lathe amplifier added distortions to the process, vinyl pressing and the like.
For we can know what we are loosing through playback LP on an analog rig we need to differentiate between these two 2 stages " after the tape information.
Yes, a R2R give us a picture of what is the sound with out those two stages process where signal is heavy degraded.
So, IMHO that kind of comparison: R2R against LP playback at home is more " academic/retoric " than a useful one tool.
Regards and enjoy the music,
raul.
+++ " It helps that we use a R2R as reference/comparison?, certainly yes ... " +++
I think I was plain wrong, certainly does not helps because a important part of the LP recording process is not on the tape, example: RIAA eq de-emphasis, cutting lathe amplifier added distortions to the process, vinyl pressing and the like.
For we can know what we are loosing through playback LP on an analog rig we need to differentiate between these two 2 stages " after the tape information.
Yes, a R2R give us a picture of what is the sound with out those two stages process where signal is heavy degraded.
So, IMHO that kind of comparison: R2R against LP playback at home is more " academic/retoric " than a useful one tool.
Regards and enjoy the music,
raul.