*WHITE PAPER* The Sound of Music - How & Why the Speaker Cable Matters


G'DAY

I’ve spent a sizeable amount of the last year putting together this white paper: The Sound of Music and Error in Your Speaker Cables

Yes, I’ve done it for all the naysayers but mainly for all the cable advocates that know how you connect your separates determines the level of accuracy you can part from your system.

I’ve often theorized what is happening but now, here is some proof of what we are indeed hearing in speaker cables caused by the mismatch between the characteristic impedance of the speaker cable and the loudspeaker impedance.

I’ve included the circuit so you can build and test this out for yourselves.


Let the fun begin


Max Townshend 

Townshend Audio



128x128Ag insider logo xs@2xtownshend-audio
It's of Audiogon management to decide if those of commercial interests should keep polluting this site, or be stopped and exiled.
I do not get how we got from speaker cables theory so far...like on my thread How to select a good Speaker Cable
it is all about objecting a subject no one tried, but extensively argued.
It may explain a toddler who rejects a food even he didn't try it, just because. 
The unfortunate truth is, that none of those who object the idea (connection between Amp's DF and cable's resistance) do not have an alternative. This thread do offer something, but it is far away from physics, as west from east.
 
audio2design

until you show your face, dude, you are attacking others, and doing harm, in a one sided manner without any mention or seeming understanding of the complexity of the entire spectrum of physics at play.

Until you show your face, you are morally and ethically defunct and playing a one sided game in favor of yourself....
teo_audio1,716 posts01-24-2021 11:50amYou are still getting it wrong for all the wrong reasons and attacking people who have commercial interests here, when you probably also have commercial interests.

SHOW YOUR FACE.


PROVE YOUR CLAIMS!!!!    Don't get made at me for making claims YOU cannot back up. Stop trying to make this about me. This has nothing to do with me. I am not making claims which cannot be supported.


YOU tell me I am wrong. PROVE IT!!    PROVIDE ---REAL--- Evidence to support your claims. Don't get mad at me for your failure to support your argument. Don't get made at me for posting ridiculous claims about 1 picosecond requirements for audio.  I didn't write that. YOU did.

teo_audio1,717 posts01-24-2021 12:07pm audio2design

until you show your face, dude, you are attacking others, and doing harm, in a one sided manner without any mention or seeming understanding of the complexity of the entire spectrum of physics at play.

Until you show your face, you are morally and ethically defunct and playing a one sided game in favor of yourself....



Until you stop making claims that are absurd, like the 1 picosecond accuracy or repeatability in audio, YOU will keep doing damage to YOUR personal and professional brand.

Who I am does not change 1 iota the veracity of what I write. If it is wrong, and you can prove that, THEN DO IT!   If not, then you are doing nothing but deflecting from your own issues by trying to make this about me. I didn't force you to write what you wrote, but I will point out the errors.
audio2design
... PROVE YOUR CLAIMS!!!! ... YOU tell me I am wrong. PROVE IT!! PROVIDE ---REAL--- Evidence to support your claims. Don’t get mad at me ...
We have been thorough this before. No one here owes you proof of anything.
This is not a scientific forum - it’s a hobbyist’s group. If proof is what you demand - and your use of ALL CAPS and multiple use of "!!!!!" seem to suggest a demand - then you are really in the wrong place.