Why high-end cable manufacturers don't post measurements?

Mr. djones51

I don't like your jokes:

"My amplifier DF is >10000
My wire distance is 4000 feet."

Is that comes with an IQ of a single digit?

Mr. djones51

You state:

"Not to mention that I am suspicious about the idea of finishing a thick cable with a thin cable and then pretending it is all thick cable."

But it is no problem for you, that all the cable length is " a thin cable"?
I do not understand that logic!

That thin cable, has more functions, than fit a #0 awg into a standard banana plug or spade.
It provides a strain relief, As an #8 awg is way more flexible than a #0 awg.
It also solves the weight issue you were concerned off.
The cable is made well’ so it is very strong and it holds well it’s own weight. No problem with that. I have cables made years ago, still holds as new.

As the "thin cable" is very short (4" or less) it’s relative resistance vs. the rest of the 6-10 feet, is negligible. Just for your concern. There are more small resistors when you do the sum: the banana ends, the solderings on ends etc'.

b4icu,

The above was not djones51, but me.

Of course, there are very small resistors, even tiny fuse filaments, somewhere along the way. I will let the world continue losing while you continue winning.

By the way, your statement to djones51...

"Is that comes with an IQ of a single digit?"

is worthy of an IQ of your preferred speaker wire gauge.

How about learning some manners in communication and developing a little sense of humor while you are making a joke of yourself?

I’d be curious to examine the 0/8 interface. If it’s soldered, it’s likely a dry joint. If crimped, an incomplete contact using a fraction of the actual wire gauge. Perhaps it’s a couple of ring terminals with a bolt?

Are the cables twisted or spread out as a pair with inconsistent separation giving roller coaster inductance?

Care to post the technical details, with photos, b4icu?

And, oh yeah, R is least troublesome of LCR. Do the math.