why is a 13" tonearm design really superior?


we just mounted the SAEC WE-8000 on my Nakamichi and I can´t really believe what kind of fantastic sound this tonearm is able to reproduce. Is it because this is a very special 13" design or because of the extraordinary headshell design? I think it is the only tonearm with such a long straight alu-pipe. Am i right? Also the lift design is unique, this lift stops at every level you like to use.
Why are todays tonearm developers not anymore going for a 13" or 14" design?
thuchan
The main reason for the extinction of long and super long tonearms our days is because there are a lot (expensive...) turntables out there which can not mount 13" and 14" tonearms at all.
There are already more than a few which have difficulties accommodating 10" and 12" tonearms (Basis Debut Gold, Linn Sondek, most plinth-type TTs - for instance).
Furthermore - of course - increased length is always a trade-off between rigidity and effective moving mass on one side and minimized tangential error and minimized VTA change during warps and uneven areas on the records surface.
ok that´s a limiting factor of course, understand.
Today a friend of mine showed me a pic of a 24" tonearm.
He listend to it and was overwhelmed. He will find out what manufacturer it is, I will report on it.
Maybe the headshell speciality with very long straight tonearms like the SAEC 8000 is also a kind of issue.
Thuchan, there is another solution, namely a straight-line tracker. There are many issues with it also. I did see a pivoting straight-line tracker at CES, which used a second arm to keep the headshell and cartridge always tangential to the grooves. I don't remember that name, perhaps because the arm cost $15k.