Why use a super accurate cartridge protractor

08-23-11: John_gordon
But importantly, it should be a TWO point protractor, not an arc, as you will have to make adjustments at the arm base rather than the headshell.

Yes, I was forgetting that the SME has no adjustability to maintain a fixed pivot to stylus distance (for cartridges that vary with their mount to stylus distance).
A strange decision IMO....I'm dubious about the rigidity argument. Other manufacturers seem to get excellent results with slotted headshells.

The Mint would work, but only if ordered for effective length when used with a specific cartridge (and other cartridges that conform to the same spec).

Hi Tobes,

if you want to know more re SME geometry, see this link for my take on why SME doesn't need this facility.
SME Geometry
There are some serious misconceptions and misunderstandings regarding their choice of geometry, which have led to erroneous comments from many quarters, including arm and cartridge designers who should know better.

Given the vagueness in cartridge specs regarding stylus to mounting hole dimensions, I would be loath to assume in practice that the actual arc of the arm would be as calculated, based on published data for the arm and the cartridge, and consequently it would not necessarily match exactly that of the Mint, which is pointless if its arc is as accurate as claimed.

In any case, with the SME, as with slotted headshells, there is still the possibility of twisting the cartridge by a small amount (or more, by using smaller diameter screws) to align the cantilever.
regards,

Thanks John, very informative explanation.

One wonders why SME couldn't provide something similar(?).

At least SME provide some detailed specifications with their arms (it's strange that some other designers don't make these details readily available).

However, as you say in your article, SME's specification of pivot to stylus (to a hundredth of a mm) is silly and misleading given the arms design.

Cheers - Paul

I wanted to find out just how parallel my stylus was to my tonearm but I do not have a mirrored protractor. I do have access to our Smart Scope (a computerized optical measuring device) at work, so I very carefully schlepped my cartridge/headshell assembly to work today. As it was, the stylus was 3 degrees off parallel to the edge of the headshell. Perhaps I should back up here and explain that I have a SME 309 tonearm, which has a removable headshell. Mounted to my tonearm is a BenzMicro Ref3. I do not really have much room to adjust the alignment- just what clearance exists between the headshell holes and the screw diameters. I was able to move the cartridge and reduce the angle by just one degree. But I also could see that the cantilever was resting just off center of the vertical mark of the headshell and down on the brass housing. I suspected and confirmed that when the stylus and suspension are under a 2 gram load the cantilever is more centered both vertically and horizontally. So I think the cantilever is very nearly at zero degrees when cued onto a record. To conclude, I did not hear a difference, but then I only moved the cartridge by one degree. I think I have the tonearm dialed in pretty good. I have the Tracking force at about 2.4 grams. That setting was tweaked in by listening. I have the anti-skate set at 2.4 grams too. I started out with a lower setting but could hear a little distortion in the right channel when tracking nearer to the center of records. So I dialed up the anti-skate until that went away. Over the years I have used an average thickness record to set up my VTA and HTA since the SME arm has no easy way to adjust VTA on the fly. This set seems to work fine for me with the thicker, heavy vinyl and thinner records.