Marco, WAV files DO have segments that are reserved for metadata-like information. The problem is that there isn't a standard way of placing the information into these segments. Next-generation lossless formats (such as Apple Lossless and FLAC) are much better in this regard (and use only about 50% of the space). That's one of the major reasons why when we have a WAV vs FLAC debate, I'm firmly on the FLAC side.
Rick_van, if you copy the data back to the original location, does it get better? And which library did you delete? Did you create a new library for the files in the location that you copied TO, and then deleted it (leaving the old library in the original location), or did you only have 1 library to start with, and subsequently delete it?
The good news is that if you do need to re-rip the CD's to reestablish all of the info that you're missing, there are commercial services where you send them CD's and a hard drive and they do the legwork. Maybe you'll choose Apple Lossless format instead of WAV.
Michael
Rick_van, if you copy the data back to the original location, does it get better? And which library did you delete? Did you create a new library for the files in the location that you copied TO, and then deleted it (leaving the old library in the original location), or did you only have 1 library to start with, and subsequently delete it?
The good news is that if you do need to re-rip the CD's to reestablish all of the info that you're missing, there are commercial services where you send them CD's and a hard drive and they do the legwork. Maybe you'll choose Apple Lossless format instead of WAV.
Michael