My opinion on "system reviews" would be a little different.Here it goes;
-Have someone from the magazine purchase the equipment to be reviewed and have them criticize the "whole experience".
-The reviewer can then perform a qick first impression review of the product for the amount of the loan period from the dealer.
-Since this would be "unfair" to the manufacturer, the magazine's product request department or person, would request the product from the manufacturer for a "proper" review by a reviewer with no prior knowledge of the product to be reviewed.
-The product should be reviewed by two reviewers, with the second person writting a short piece if in agreement, a longer piece if they disagree with each other.
I have further thoughts on this subject but don't want to bore all of you with the details. Basically I would love to read someone experiencing what all of us have gone through purchasing equipment from dealers.Thanks for the oppurtunity to respond!
-Have someone from the magazine purchase the equipment to be reviewed and have them criticize the "whole experience".
-The reviewer can then perform a qick first impression review of the product for the amount of the loan period from the dealer.
-Since this would be "unfair" to the manufacturer, the magazine's product request department or person, would request the product from the manufacturer for a "proper" review by a reviewer with no prior knowledge of the product to be reviewed.
-The product should be reviewed by two reviewers, with the second person writting a short piece if in agreement, a longer piece if they disagree with each other.
I have further thoughts on this subject but don't want to bore all of you with the details. Basically I would love to read someone experiencing what all of us have gone through purchasing equipment from dealers.Thanks for the oppurtunity to respond!