Anovak,
The data on Tergitol shows that one of its benefits is improved dissolution rate, i.e. how quickly does it dissolve. Temperature and agitation improves the dissolution rate, but only up to point. When the water is close to the cloud point (about 60C for both), the dissolution rate decreases. Based on what I have read, it should dissolve much faster - first you will be using less Tergitol than Triton, and combined with the improved dissolution rate, it should mix easily. However, you may want to add in 2 steps if if does not mix easily with one step, but keep in mind at 25C, it may take about 1-2 minutes for it to dissolve with agitation (simple shaking).
FYI, I bought the Tergitol 15-S-9, and the Vinylstack label protector and should (weather permitting) have both tommorrow to do my own testing with simple manual cleaning. I got back into vinyl about 4 yrs ago, and have since accummulated about 300 albums, mostly new or like new. But I have a few new old stock that are very noisy, so I am going to try the Library of Congress method of scrub and rinse to see what I can get. My library does not yet warrant the cost of a UT process.
However, from the 1980's to early 2000, I was the U.S. Navy technical authority for precision cleaning of Oxygen and Compressed Gas/Life Support Sytems. Did a lot or work with the Navy labs and NASA when we were all working to replace the CFC solvents, and ultimately developed precision aqueous cleaning processes using UT that are now documented MIL-STD-1330 and 1622. So, I have some background; its been over 10 yrs since I was deep in it, but not much has changed, and as they say all that goes around, comes around. There is a good short article by Blackstone Ultrasonics you can find on the web, with a NASA address, that discusses the UT theory and items to consider. This was all done 20 yrs ago. UT frequency, duration, temperature, surface tension and items to be cleaned stacking are critical factors. Rapid rotation, i.e., more than 1 rpm, will not leave the surface exposed long enough to get the full benefits. Also, too much duration/power at low frequency can damage the surface. There is an old test where you place a piece of aluminum foil in the tank; if it perforates, you probably have too much power/duration for cleaning a vinyl record.
The data on Tergitol shows that one of its benefits is improved dissolution rate, i.e. how quickly does it dissolve. Temperature and agitation improves the dissolution rate, but only up to point. When the water is close to the cloud point (about 60C for both), the dissolution rate decreases. Based on what I have read, it should dissolve much faster - first you will be using less Tergitol than Triton, and combined with the improved dissolution rate, it should mix easily. However, you may want to add in 2 steps if if does not mix easily with one step, but keep in mind at 25C, it may take about 1-2 minutes for it to dissolve with agitation (simple shaking).
FYI, I bought the Tergitol 15-S-9, and the Vinylstack label protector and should (weather permitting) have both tommorrow to do my own testing with simple manual cleaning. I got back into vinyl about 4 yrs ago, and have since accummulated about 300 albums, mostly new or like new. But I have a few new old stock that are very noisy, so I am going to try the Library of Congress method of scrub and rinse to see what I can get. My library does not yet warrant the cost of a UT process.
However, from the 1980's to early 2000, I was the U.S. Navy technical authority for precision cleaning of Oxygen and Compressed Gas/Life Support Sytems. Did a lot or work with the Navy labs and NASA when we were all working to replace the CFC solvents, and ultimately developed precision aqueous cleaning processes using UT that are now documented MIL-STD-1330 and 1622. So, I have some background; its been over 10 yrs since I was deep in it, but not much has changed, and as they say all that goes around, comes around. There is a good short article by Blackstone Ultrasonics you can find on the web, with a NASA address, that discusses the UT theory and items to consider. This was all done 20 yrs ago. UT frequency, duration, temperature, surface tension and items to be cleaned stacking are critical factors. Rapid rotation, i.e., more than 1 rpm, will not leave the surface exposed long enough to get the full benefits. Also, too much duration/power at low frequency can damage the surface. There is an old test where you place a piece of aluminum foil in the tank; if it perforates, you probably have too much power/duration for cleaning a vinyl record.