2. misc-audio
  3. 174499-166564

About users with hidden agendas

If you know that a user is a dealer and they fail to disclose and attacks other users because they make a point against their interest, do you expose the user?

I know of a gentleman here that continuously posts and goes after people and does not disclose who he is. 

What are the ethics of this forum?

128x128astolfor
pesky_wabbit's avatar
pesky_wabbit
1,183 posts
 

thought we finished them all off in the war Jeeves….

Ag insider logo xs@2x
cleeds
5,957 posts
 
tsushima1

@cleeds

Do you really sweep all objective thinking members here into your facile little box with “ They pretend to know how things sound without ever actually listening to them”

Certainly not! I never suggested any such thing. Here’s what I wrote:

... the self-described "objectivists" here are often anything but ...

 

secretguy
1,712 posts
 

This thread started out to be so fun too....

Ag insider logo xs@2x
cleeds
5,957 posts
 
pesky_wabbit

 

Ted loves to lump everybody and anybody who criticises him into one convenient ‘mob’. @cleeds follows suit, in spades.

Huh?

This thread has 317 responses.

I posted one singular response, itself a total of five sentences. Calling that "follows suit, in spades" is absurd.

You’ll just have to accept that among the hundreds of responses in a given thread, I may weigh in with an opinion now and then.

milpai's avatar
milpai
2,402 posts
 

Live example of "agenda" is a thread that is updated on a daily basis of a certain obscure brand of DAC. (I think they try to keep it alive, with the same 3-4 people). The moment someone posts facts about the manufacturer or dealers, 2 posters immediately jump in with response to protect. This has happened multiple times. I have not seen users protect brands and threads so seriously.

More to discover