Hi Sd; Stereophile, not too long ago, reviewed a couple of consumer grade CD-R/RW burners-- you could find the review issue listed in a Recommended Components issue as both players were recommended. I believe a $500. JVC and (I think) a Denon or Marantz at about $1500.
The review was done by M. Fremer, and he concluded that at 1X record speed either made excellent copies, but for analog copying the more expensive CD-R was superior, ie it had a better A to D converter. You might want to look up this review as Fremer did some LP copying also (if I remember right). Also, the the more expensive CD-R burner made a better transport. My Pioneer 739 does not make a very good transport, but that's comparing it to a ML 37.
I have copied many CDs with a Pioneer 739 at both 1X and 2X, and cannot really hear a difference between the copy and the original when using digital, but after Fremer's comments decided that I'd just use 1X to be sure. Good Luck. Craig.
The review was done by M. Fremer, and he concluded that at 1X record speed either made excellent copies, but for analog copying the more expensive CD-R was superior, ie it had a better A to D converter. You might want to look up this review as Fremer did some LP copying also (if I remember right). Also, the the more expensive CD-R burner made a better transport. My Pioneer 739 does not make a very good transport, but that's comparing it to a ML 37.
I have copied many CDs with a Pioneer 739 at both 1X and 2X, and cannot really hear a difference between the copy and the original when using digital, but after Fremer's comments decided that I'd just use 1X to be sure. Good Luck. Craig.