indeed. they look like such a gimmick so i hope the sound is better than that
underwood hifi has a GaN amp coming out, so he's not the only game in town.
underwood hifi has a GaN amp coming out, so he's not the only game in town.
After 50 years, I have finally found my destination amps... AGD Audions!
Mbolek I run an analog only system through Tetra 606 speakers.(91db 6ohms minimal) My front end is a Woodsong Garrard 301, Triplanar arm, Lyra Atlas SL cartridge and Atma-Sphere MP-1 preamp. Ralph Not sure I understand. If Alberto does hold a patent on the GaNFETs, are not his modules then uniquely designed and one of a kind. (other than the “tube” enclosure) Surely this is the case for much or some central part of the design? Are you saying that AGD are not unlike other GaN based amps? |
atmasphere06-15-2021 8:01am To be clear, Alberto does share a patent on GaNFETs (US8847408B2). And the modules he makes are of course designed for audio. But it appears to me that you've conflated the modules with the GaNFETs themselves, and the latter cannot be specifically designed for audio. This is because class D are switching circuits which have a lot in common with switch mode power supplies and the like. Put another way: there isn't a way that the device can be specialized for an audio switching application where it will not also benefit a switching power supply or battery charger in exactly the same way. I believe mglik's information comes from a 6Moons review or maybe direct conversation with Alberto. From 6Moons quoting Alberto: "...The device I use was developed very specifically for class D audio, *not* for power supplies, low-voltage points of load or RF circuits. Hence the key figures of merit for the device were optimized for best performance within specific voltage ranges, frequencies and current..." and "...On why nobody else can use his KT88 GaN, it's like with Nelson Pass' proprietary static induction transitor. Alberto acquired the entire remaining lot..." |
Not sure I understand. If Alberto does hold a patent on the GaNFETs, are not his modules then uniquely designed and one of a kind. (other than the “tube” enclosure) Surely this is the case for much or some central part of the design? Are you saying that AGD are not unlike other GaN based amps?I'm sure the modules are uniquely designed! That to me is really obvious. But at the same time the circuit design is probably very similar to other class D self-oscillating circuits. It would of course differ in how the circuit is laid out and what parts are used. All class D designers are faced with the same circumstances in this regard. The idea of the output device being designed specifically for audio sounds a bit like hype to me. GaNFETs are desirable for three reasons- the speed of them, they low resistance ON state and the reverse conduction characteristic. While these things benefit class D amps, they also benefit other switching circuits as well. |