I cant understand why anyone would prefer anything else. In my system the highs are as clean and clear as I've ever heard. The cables are extremely natural with a supurb soundstage..very deep, very wide. The bass when required, shakes the house but with pitch and definition. Ive said this before, but, I tried almost everything out there including the highest priced spreads from the most prestigeous manufacturers, and nothing is as good as the anticables.
Anti-Cable High Frequency Performance
I've just installed a set of anti-cables in my bi-wired system with Magnepan 3.6 speakers. I find the bass and mid-range nice and tight and the overall sound very balanced, smooth, and natural. The soundstage is very good.
But I notice that the high end is not as extended as my previous cables (good quality oxygen free heavy gauge copper strand). There's less detail in the upper end.
I did twist the anti-cables as directed in the instructions to get as much high end performance as possible.
I like the natural sound but I miss the high end definition.
Has anyone else had a similar experience?
Or, does anyone have any advice about alternative cables at the same price?
I should say that I am very impressed with the overall quality of the sound. This is not an anti-anti-cable post. Just trying to tweak it some more.
But I notice that the high end is not as extended as my previous cables (good quality oxygen free heavy gauge copper strand). There's less detail in the upper end.
I did twist the anti-cables as directed in the instructions to get as much high end performance as possible.
I like the natural sound but I miss the high end definition.
Has anyone else had a similar experience?
Or, does anyone have any advice about alternative cables at the same price?
I should say that I am very impressed with the overall quality of the sound. This is not an anti-anti-cable post. Just trying to tweak it some more.
- ...
- 11 posts total
- 11 posts total