Are linear tracking arms better than pivoted arms?


My answer to this question is yes. Linear tracking arms trace the record exactly the way it was cut. Pivoted arms generally have two null points across the record and they are the only two points the geometry is correct. All other points on the record have a degree of error with pivoted arms. Linear tracking arms don't need anti-skating like pivoted arms do which is another plus for them.

Linear tracking arms take more skill to set up initially, but I feel they reward the owner with superior sound quality. I have owned and used a variety of pivoted arms over the years, but I feel that my ET-2 is superior sounding to all of them. You can set up a pivoted arm incorrectly and it will still play music. Linear tracking arms pretty much force you to have everything correct or else they will not play. Are they worth the fuss? I think so.
mepearson
We need Jonathan Carr to chime on in this discussion. He designs cartridges for Lyra and used to post on some audio forms a few years ago. But, i can't remember which website.

I be he'd have a lot of insight to share on cartridge design, tolerances, forces, and tonearm factors.

Does anyone remember which audio website he posts on? I think his moniker used to be "J Carr" or something to that effect. For some reasons, I think he now only drops in on one of the DIY Audio boards.
Tzed: Welcome to the monkey house. Perhaps we can team up and ask Phil for tips on setting up our Southers.
Thanks Samujohn, should be a fun ride.
I had a B&O 4004 but it was plug 'n' play so obviously a very different beast to the Souther.
I love the idea that there is a human knowledge base available for question answering and advice.
My first hurdle will be mounting the arm to the table....
D-Mo,

I think the inestimable Jonathan Carr posted on Audio Asylum in the past.

Vbr,
Sam
Dertonearm, good point on the short lever and VTA/VTF changes when tracked over a warped record. Mine does dance up and down and side to side when I play with my short levered linear arm. It is a sight to admire and be amazed that inspite of more than normal visible movement of the stylus. the sound rarely changes its tone and pace. The reason is yes, it does have excessive amplitude as compared to longer linear arms or pivot arms, but the amplitude frequency is also higher and relatively fast, so as to be the effect less noticeable (hear). At least that is what i have found.

Another plus, IME, for linear arms ( that hasn't been talked about) is that they are able to track more readily than the pivot arms in case of playing a record with very low freq content (examples- techno music- Deepchord, Pole, Luciano, Patha du Prince,etc). This may be unique to my set ups. Let others chime in here.

Look, we all agree that there are pro and cons in both arm designs, but with all being equal, not extreme condition/s of using warped record, linear arm still has overall advantage of 'complete' tracking fidelity than the pivot arms and hence superior performance advantage and I think this is what this thread is about. You just have to listen both (good examples well set up with same cart, phono cable, phono) back to back to realize.

I think it is time to get handle on this tracking error (info reading loss) we all are talking about with pivot arms. Has anybody done 3D geometric study to quantify the tracking error with pivot arms. I mean which part of the info are we loosing? left channel error, right channel error, what is the content we are missing?