As i said relatively low cost can vary a lot in function of each one of us different needs and budget limit...
My main point is about the way and the meansĀ to enjoy a "relatively low cost system" not so much about a fixed amount of money...
The back tought behind this question is that mechanical and electrical and acoustical knowlwedge define audiophile experience more than mere price tags...
the other point is then that acoustic satisfaction is possible at relatively low cost...
I dont define a "cost" because when you know what to do to improve an audio system, his cost matter way lessĀ for a musical and sound quality experience...
Even Bill gates then can come and participate and ex-plain to us how he had as much pleasure with his "low cost" system of 80,000 bucks than the other one he own of one millon dolars becauseĀ he learned how to install and embed each pieces in the right electrical, mechanical and acoustical working dimensions...
then here relatively low costĀ is defined by the specfic history os each one and his needs and budget...
My thread and question are not dogmatic opinion about pricing but inviation about thinking how to improve what we have or how to experiment for improvement BEFORE a costlier upgrades which can become useless or less useful when we learn more ...
@mahgisterĀ how do you define a relatively low cost system? I didnāt go thru the entire discussion and possibly missed it but is there a cap on a total to consider a system low cost?Ā
Compared to some other systems Iāve seen, mine is relatively low cost.