It's pretty darn obvious that a couple of things are going on here.
Many small, successful, quality audio operations have been snapped up by conglomerates over the years. A few of them have subsequently gone independent again, often taken over by some of the original principals or people associated with the original company.
As stated, if a conglomerate is willing to part with an asset, it's because it's not (sufficiently) profitable. The reason is no doubt the economy, but also the recent and much less customer-friendly ethos that characterized the brand when under the umbrella of the conglomerate.
If ARC is to flourish, it needs to go back to its roots, both technologically in in respect to customer relations.
Many small, successful, quality audio operations have been snapped up by conglomerates over the years. A few of them have subsequently gone independent again, often taken over by some of the original principals or people associated with the original company.
As stated, if a conglomerate is willing to part with an asset, it's because it's not (sufficiently) profitable. The reason is no doubt the economy, but also the recent and much less customer-friendly ethos that characterized the brand when under the umbrella of the conglomerate.
If ARC is to flourish, it needs to go back to its roots, both technologically in in respect to customer relations.