Audio Science Review = "The better the measurement, the better the sound" philosophy

While ASR-ers don’t actually perform DBT or similar nearly as often as they demand it of others

If a DBT is done, you have to count each test, no matter the number of participants, as a single data point. Because the test results may be biased. So, the number of tests required to be statistically significant goes well past the majority of tests ever reported. Make the sample of tests large enough to be statistically significant and you are at the man on the street level of participants, not trained listeners. And that is how you get Bose level of audio quality. 

@amir_asr makes a lot of assumptions. Assuming what ones ideas on audio are. Amir I for one will never point a browser at your site nor click on a link you post.

You can assume I am not interested in your findings on audio equipment I have zero interest in. You are correct you are not a scientist nor an engineer. Nor are you a professional reviewer, you are average joe with some software and that is it.

No need to respond as someone here said you monkeys will respond I could care even less about there opinions. 
 

Blind testing at Harmon/Infinity (PS- Don’t try this at home kids!!)

I didn't watch the video, but I'll take any Arnie Nudell designed Infinity over any Toole tested loudspeaker.

Less than 50% of the equipment reviewed and tested are even listened to. A handful of DBT all done by members? 

Never mind the man behind the curtain.