audio valve eklipse or aesthetix calypso


hi all I'm looking to replace my vtl 2.5 pre with either audio valve eklipse or the calypso, anyone has experience with these please give me their pros and cons
thank you
kabaraka
I've lived with the Calypso for several years now...have not heard the AV. The upside of the Calypso is that you can add a great phono stage down the road (Rhea), the price used is a bargain (my opinion) for the performance, and it can be upgraded down the road to Signature series.

Anymore I look for equipment that has an upgrade path for the sake of it being relevant for a longer period of time as other components change.

The key is to hear both if possible!
I really like my Calypso and it responds very favorably to rolling tubes. I just plugged in some Telefunken smooth plate 12AX7's and the sound is sublime.
The eclipse is great. I own it and tried many press before settling on the Eclipse.

It is not overly tubey, and has nice extension, etc. Arrange a home audition.
Hi Kabaraka, I just replaced my Eklipse with a Concert Fidelity CF-080 which costs $15000.00 more then the Audio Valve piece! I had auditioned scores of preamps, including the Calypso, and found the Eklipse to be better in its sonic performance or at least as good up to $12000.00 units. For details on the Eklipse and what tubes make it "sing" take a look at my Gon review. Hope this helps.
thanks all, I might go with the eklipse since it's about 4000$ here in thailand while the calypso is about 5000$. anyway I'll go for the audition this weekend. Teejay, do you think the eklipse will blow the vtl2.5 away by a large margin? the vtl is quite good in my system which makes me think what can the eklipse do more? I'm just curious