Benefits of an external DAC

concur on trying the Benchmark DAC3

DACs today are very good and you cannot expect major differences, like with speakers.

Take 2 Aidas and call me in the morning.

You should be able to discern a difference with the Jolida tube DAC if it's a good design. IME, all solid state DACs sound the same except for extremely minute differences that are probably attributable to psychoacoustics. I finally heard an honest and obvious difference with a Line Magnetic tube DAC. The DAC allows switching between SS and tube output. In SS mode, it sounds like every other SS DAC.

The tube DAC may be different but is not necessarily superior. Did you measure the frequency response?
CD red book is the product of the largest research effort ever into audio reproduction, by one the worlds best physics labs of the time.
The DAC chips inside these modern external DACs are manufactured by a handful of chip makers, and have now all reached audio perfection at very low cost (they only cost a few dollars each if bought in volume). Implementation is straightforward as long as the DAC designer follows the instructions of the chip maker. Hence I think your observations are what was to be expected. I did a similiar test with a range of different DACs (some very cheap) in a system with Quad 2805 electrostats. I was unable to discern any difference.

I have an Oppo 105 and have used it with 2 external DACs, the Bryston BDA-3 and the Mytek Manhatten.  The Oppo is a pretty good DAC but there is no question that the other 2 DACs each best it.

perhaps the rest of your setup is not revealing, or perhaps you do need to go up in price for DACs to start detecting differences 

OP >
One poster already hit the nail.

Try stepping up to better DACs.

Why? The argument on every DAC uses effectively the same chips is a whole other thread. The idea behind this is ‘how’ everything is implemented in any DAC, not just that all are using virtually the same chips.

The biggest aspect to supposedly better DACs is the same issue with nearly every electronic device, its power supply. Period. Well, mainly. It’s the usual starting point for nearly every component’s upgrade.

Better, read, ‘more expensive’ DACs normally will have better PS, and better shielding, more PS dedicated to this or that, etc. reputedly better analog output stages, etc.

In order to hear these supposed improvements it would or does behoove one to investigate at least somewhat the interfaces and ICs being used for connectivity. This includes sincere consideration of stepping up the Power Cable the DAC or what ever else, uses.

7500 HP dragsters don’t get down the track on Street tires. All that Horse power has to be able to hook up effectively to the track, or it’s a severe waste of time and money.

Oppo is a honest to goodness over achiever. You already said your’s was previously upgraded. Hmmm.

I did not experience OMG improvements using DACs until I stepped up from the $2K class of DACs and got into the $3K models. .
It might mean today more than $3K DACs should get auditioned, but there’s been real world gains in digital goods since then. At the end of the day however, its gonna take a fairly good step into DAC-land to boost the sQ, IMO. New models are out that deserve consideration and two of them getting a lot of pub are the Yegersol, and Comet. Both are less than $3K.

To continue running about the $1500 or less DAC playground will IMHO not hand you the results you desire. They will essentially deliver only ‘different’. Different ain’t bad, but its ordinarily not ‘better’.

Bridges are another path people are saying here that aids escalating SQ using either Ethernet or USB interfaces. To my earlier point, each of these gizmos have been said to definitely gain by improving upon their own Power supplies.

Even the Comet DAC has an upgrade option for a better power supply at point of purchase, or there after. Go figure.

Good luck in this venture.