I would use the terms focused versus unfocused imaging to realistically assess imaging performance.
Bipoles and dipoles are capable of a focused presentation I believe as are omnis, however the presentation is often (not always) different from say a good pair of monitors.
Ratios of direct to reflected sound is a discriminating factor. Bipoles/dipoles are different than most conventional box designs in this regard but setup including distance to walls also comes into play (except perhaps in an anechoic chamber) and might be done differently for different speaker types depending on the target results desired.
Time coherency across the audible sonic spectrum at any particular instant is a related but different sonic artifact that factors into quality imaging. Not sure bipoles/dipoles ae categorically any better or worse than other designs at this aspect either.
Bipoles and dipoles are capable of a focused presentation I believe as are omnis, however the presentation is often (not always) different from say a good pair of monitors.
Ratios of direct to reflected sound is a discriminating factor. Bipoles/dipoles are different than most conventional box designs in this regard but setup including distance to walls also comes into play (except perhaps in an anechoic chamber) and might be done differently for different speaker types depending on the target results desired.
Time coherency across the audible sonic spectrum at any particular instant is a related but different sonic artifact that factors into quality imaging. Not sure bipoles/dipoles ae categorically any better or worse than other designs at this aspect either.