Class A Power in A/B amplifiers?

My Krell K-300i has Class A for the first 90 of 150 at 8 Ohm.
My CODA #8 Version 1 is the first 18

abraxalito

George - yep, and the old torch bearer is yapping at my heels! Eeeek!

Yeah I got bored over at the other place, much more fun over here, for breaks giving **** to the snake oilers and voodooist like fusers, etc etc.
That sort of snake oil stuff is kept under control over there, so there no real dog fight action.
But I must admit it’s starting to become chronic here, as too many can see 10000’s% of profit selling re-badged 10cent fuses for >$150+ and having no overheads doing it!

Cheers George

It’s possible. You can get fairly close to full Class A performance with A-B, but may be limited by a slight lack of foundation to the sound. When people say class A is smooth, sweet, or well-rounded, those are subjective opinions. 

The conduction angle of class A is 360 degrees. Power hungry but with maximum performance.

There really is no such class as Class AB, it is used to describe the mode of operation when a Class A amp hits a low impedance and one of the pairs of output transistors stops conducting.

This statement is false. Class AB is defined as any push-pull amplifier which is class A at lower power (which is done to prevent artifacts at the zero crossing point) and class B at higher power. The *amount* of class A power is undefined.
Types of amplifier class:
Class A1, A2 and A3 (the latter recently develeped)
Class AB (which includes class AB1 and AB2)Class B
Class C (only used in RF power amplifiers)
Class D (doesn’t refer to digital; ’D’ was simply the next letter- the first commercial class D amps were made in the 1960s)
Class E (switching RF amplifier)
Class F (harmonically tuned RF amplifier)
Class G (modified A or AB amp; IIRC first used by Hitachi)
and on and on...

Might be helfpul to understand how A and B differ, and that transistors are not perfectly linear. It takes a little current before they wake up and can act in a linear fashion. This is what causes the notch distortion during the crossing of 0V.

In Class A, both legs start at full on. Since they are balanced this ressults in 0V at the output, and maximum power draw through what are essentially to closed switches.

In Class B both are off, again, achieving 0V at the output and minimum power draw through essentially open switches.

The bias, or quiescent current, in an AB amplifier keeps both legs on enough to avoid the dreaded notch distortion without consuming 100% of the power in a true class A amplifier. The difference is that eventually as the output voltage shifts far enough away from 0Vthat one leg will shut mostly off, switching to B. When the voltage goes back towards 0V that leg now turns on, with some inherent distortion as they attempt to reach equilibrium.

Personally I find the arguments for/against Class A on technical terms alone lack overwhelming evidence. I've heard Class A I liked and Class A I really did not.  Same for A/B amplifiers.  So while it's fun to look at how engineers have take on the same challenge via a variety of methods I always find my ears better at determining what I am going to want to listen to than amplifier classes.